<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: pipe in srchFilter in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/pipe-in-srchFilter/m-p/40266#M7472</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Search filters can only contain argument to the "search" command: ANDs/ORs/NOTs of keywords and fields.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 00:51:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Stephen_Sorkin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-02-08T00:51:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>pipe in srchFilter</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/pipe-in-srchFilter/m-p/40265#M7471</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would like to apply a dedup to all searches performed by users in a certain role.  Is there a way to do this with the srchFilter option?  I have tried setting this to "| dedup _raw" but it seems this creates unbalanced parentheses in my query.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Just a little background: I have indexers across 2 sites with data being replicated by forwarders for redundancy for one index.  I'm trying to avoid duplicate results in that index when distributing the search across all indexers.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 00:30:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/pipe-in-srchFilter/m-p/40265#M7471</guid>
      <dc:creator>nvtssplunk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-08T00:30:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pipe in srchFilter</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/pipe-in-srchFilter/m-p/40266#M7472</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Search filters can only contain argument to the "search" command: ANDs/ORs/NOTs of keywords and fields.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 00:51:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/pipe-in-srchFilter/m-p/40266#M7472</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen_Sorkin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-08T00:51:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pipe in srchFilter</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/pipe-in-srchFilter/m-p/40267#M7473</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok, so that's the anti-solution. Is there another way to accomplish this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 23:02:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/pipe-in-srchFilter/m-p/40267#M7473</guid>
      <dc:creator>nvtssplunk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-08T23:02:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pipe in srchFilter</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/pipe-in-srchFilter/m-p/40268#M7474</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is actually technically possible but NOT SUPPORTED BY SPLUNK! reference this question and please upgoat. &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://answers.splunk.com/answers/314192/use-srchfilter-to-anonymize-data-based-on-role.html#answer-314196"&gt;http://answers.splunk.com/answers/314192/use-srchfilter-to-anonymize-data-based-on-role.html#answer-314196&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2015 16:21:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/pipe-in-srchFilter/m-p/40268#M7474</guid>
      <dc:creator>RicoSuave</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-02T16:21:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

