<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Crowd sourcing sensitive data masking rules (PII, Passwords, keys, etc.) for various sourcetypes in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Crowd-sourcing-sensitive-data-masking-rules-PII-Passwords-keys/m-p/401651#M71503</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;That was might thought as well... some sort of negative look-behind.  I thought I was good at regex until I tried to mask passwords with low fp rate.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 23:50:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dstaulcu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-05-18T23:50:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Crowd sourcing sensitive data masking rules (PII, Passwords, keys, etc.) for various sourcetypes</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Crowd-sourcing-sensitive-data-masking-rules-PII-Passwords-keys/m-p/401648#M71500</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My team has a number of index-time sedcmd-based password masking rules for words in known positions of passwords.  This strategy has worked well for us for a while.   We are currently wrestling with a case where users accidentally include their passwords along with their upn (user@domain) in the userid field of a windows logon.   Does anyone have a good way to handle this condition?  &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Similarly, does anyone know of any projects to curate lists of trusted splunk transforms for sensitive data masking?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 11:30:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Crowd-sourcing-sensitive-data-masking-rules-PII-Passwords-keys/m-p/401648#M71500</guid>
      <dc:creator>dstaulcu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-17T11:30:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Crowd sourcing sensitive data masking rules (PII, Passwords, keys, etc.) for various sourcetypes</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Crowd-sourcing-sensitive-data-masking-rules-PII-Passwords-keys/m-p/401649#M71501</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There's no accounting for stupidity.  &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Perhaps, however, if the domain portion of the upn is well-known, you can mask everything that follows it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 15:05:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Crowd-sourcing-sensitive-data-masking-rules-PII-Passwords-keys/m-p/401649#M71501</guid>
      <dc:creator>richgalloway</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-17T15:05:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Crowd sourcing sensitive data masking rules (PII, Passwords, keys, etc.) for various sourcetypes</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Crowd-sourcing-sensitive-data-masking-rules-PII-Passwords-keys/m-p/401650#M71502</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;From the documentation side I see the following &lt;A href="http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/7.1.0/Data/Anonymizedata"&gt;Anonymize data&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 15:13:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Crowd-sourcing-sensitive-data-masking-rules-PII-Passwords-keys/m-p/401650#M71502</guid>
      <dc:creator>ddrillic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-17T15:13:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Crowd sourcing sensitive data masking rules (PII, Passwords, keys, etc.) for various sourcetypes</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Crowd-sourcing-sensitive-data-masking-rules-PII-Passwords-keys/m-p/401651#M71503</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That was might thought as well... some sort of negative look-behind.  I thought I was good at regex until I tried to mask passwords with low fp rate.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 23:50:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Crowd-sourcing-sensitive-data-masking-rules-PII-Passwords-keys/m-p/401651#M71503</guid>
      <dc:creator>dstaulcu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-18T23:50:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

