<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Data cloning and load balancing in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Data-cloning-and-load-balancing/m-p/357653#M65307</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok, got it! We have only one target group so it's not data cloning. Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2017 13:22:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>splunkreal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-06-20T13:22:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Data cloning and load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Data-cloning-and-load-balancing/m-p/357644#M65298</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello guys,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;we have this config for outputs.conf :&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;*[tcpout]&lt;BR /&gt;
defaultGroup = ssl_splk_sitesAB_9997&lt;BR /&gt;
useACK = true&lt;BR /&gt;
maxQueueSize = 100MB&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;[tcpout:ssl_splk_sitesAB_9997]&lt;BR /&gt;
server = s301lxidxxx01:9997, s302lxidxxx01:9997&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;[tcpout-server://s301lxidxxx01:9997]&lt;BR /&gt;
sslCertPath=$SPLUNK_HOME/etc/auth/server.pem&lt;BR /&gt;
sslPassword=yyy&lt;BR /&gt;
sslRootCAPath=$SPLUNK_HOME/etc/apps/APP_OUTPUTS_SitesAB/local/cacert.2017.pem&lt;BR /&gt;
sslVerifyServerCert=false&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;[tcpout-server://s302lxidxxx01:9997]&lt;BR /&gt;
sslCertPath=$SPLUNK_HOME/etc/auth/server.pem&lt;BR /&gt;
sslPassword=yyy&lt;BR /&gt;
sslRootCAPath=$SPLUNK_HOME/etc/apps/APP_OUTPUTS_SitesAB/local/cacert.2017.pem&lt;BR /&gt;
sslVerifyServerCert=false*&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;This is data cloning. However we would like to add a third server (s303...) only in case both first indexers fail. How would you do?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 14:31:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Data-cloning-and-load-balancing/m-p/357644#M65298</guid>
      <dc:creator>splunkreal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-29T14:31:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data cloning and load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Data-cloning-and-load-balancing/m-p/357645#M65299</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is generally done with index replication, which would be a more practical way to go (do not reinvent the wheel):&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.6.0/Indexer/Aboutclusters"&gt;https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.6.0/Indexer/Aboutclusters&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 14:09:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Data-cloning-and-load-balancing/m-p/357645#M65299</guid>
      <dc:creator>woodcock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-19T14:09:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data cloning and load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Data-cloning-and-load-balancing/m-p/357646#M65300</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello woodcock, there is already index replication with s303 (third server) but it is not directly connected to forwarders. The current issue is if main indexers go down then agents won't send data until they are up again.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 14:17:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Data-cloning-and-load-balancing/m-p/357646#M65300</guid>
      <dc:creator>splunkreal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-19T14:17:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data cloning and load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Data-cloning-and-load-balancing/m-p/357647#M65301</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Then you are doing your replication wrong.  You setup an &lt;CODE&gt;index cluster&lt;/CODE&gt; and then have the forwarder's &lt;CODE&gt;outputs.conf&lt;/CODE&gt; settings controlled by the &lt;CODE&gt;Cluster Master&lt;/CODE&gt;.  The &lt;CODE&gt;index replication&lt;/CODE&gt; in the indexer tier ensures that no data or searchability is lost if 1 more more indexers goes down.  You are trying to manually implement a well-tested core feature and it is not a good idea.  Read the document link that I posted.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 14:21:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Data-cloning-and-load-balancing/m-p/357647#M65301</guid>
      <dc:creator>woodcock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-19T14:21:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data cloning and load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Data-cloning-and-load-balancing/m-p/357648#M65302</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok, is it the current implementation which is wrong or adding a third server as a loadbalancer? Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 14:49:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Data-cloning-and-load-balancing/m-p/357648#M65302</guid>
      <dc:creator>splunkreal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-19T14:49:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data cloning and load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Data-cloning-and-load-balancing/m-p/357649#M65303</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Your implementation is wrong.  Read more here:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.6.1/Indexer/indexerdiscovery"&gt;http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.6.1/Indexer/indexerdiscovery&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 14:54:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Data-cloning-and-load-balancing/m-p/357649#M65303</guid>
      <dc:creator>woodcock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-19T14:54:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data cloning and load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Data-cloning-and-load-balancing/m-p/357650#M65304</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If I've understood, just one indexer should receive data then replicating automatically inside the index cluster? I think it has been implemented to have real time data on both indexers.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:14:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Data-cloning-and-load-balancing/m-p/357650#M65304</guid>
      <dc:creator>splunkreal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-19T15:14:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data cloning and load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Data-cloning-and-load-balancing/m-p/357651#M65305</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Exactly.  Then you have your forwarders auto-discover the AsOfRightNowWhichIndexersShouldBeUsedForRoundRobin instead of hard-coding a list.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:20:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Data-cloning-and-load-balancing/m-p/357651#M65305</guid>
      <dc:creator>woodcock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-19T15:20:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data cloning and load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Data-cloning-and-load-balancing/m-p/357652#M65306</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Regarding your point "this is data cloning" : this is not. &lt;BR /&gt;
Your current configuration is load balancing. (a forwarder sends to indexers "round robinily" ) (Do i get additional points for making up words? &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
see example: &lt;A href="https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/SplunkCloud/6.6.0/Forwarding/Setuploadbalancingd"&gt;https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/SplunkCloud/6.6.0/Forwarding/Setuploadbalancingd&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Then if indexer are in cluster, the data is replicated between indexers.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Regarding your question, Woodcock has answered ( and multisite cluster might be what you are looking for)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:46:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Data-cloning-and-load-balancing/m-p/357652#M65306</guid>
      <dc:creator>sduchene_splunk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-19T15:46:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data cloning and load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Data-cloning-and-load-balancing/m-p/357653#M65307</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok, got it! We have only one target group so it's not data cloning. Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2017 13:22:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Data-cloning-and-load-balancing/m-p/357653#M65307</guid>
      <dc:creator>splunkreal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-20T13:22:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

