<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hunk bucket archive question? in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Hunk-bucket-archive-question/m-p/259169#M49749</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;When HUNK does its bucket pushes to HDFS, it also pushes a couple small supporting files, metadata, etc... With Hadoop's issues handling small files, I was wondering if that is something that's been looked at or not? &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;For using the HUNK archiving on clustered indexers, I understand that if the buckets have 2 or greater searchable copies of the data, searches against that archived data will return duplicated results, is that correct? &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 17:25:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tsunamii</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-03-22T17:25:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Hunk bucket archive question?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Hunk-bucket-archive-question/m-p/259169#M49749</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When HUNK does its bucket pushes to HDFS, it also pushes a couple small supporting files, metadata, etc... With Hadoop's issues handling small files, I was wondering if that is something that's been looked at or not? &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;For using the HUNK archiving on clustered indexers, I understand that if the buckets have 2 or greater searchable copies of the data, searches against that archived data will return duplicated results, is that correct? &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 17:25:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Hunk-bucket-archive-question/m-p/259169#M49749</guid>
      <dc:creator>tsunamii</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-22T17:25:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hunk bucket archive question?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Hunk-bucket-archive-question/m-p/259170#M49750</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;1) jepp. There will be some overhead. Since there are not millions of buckets I don't think this will be an issue... &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;2) Every indexer will try to copy "it's own" bucket to HDFS. If there is already a valid copy of this bucket the indexer will skip this.&lt;BR /&gt;
There should be no duplicates.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;HTH,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Holger&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:29:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Hunk-bucket-archive-question/m-p/259170#M49750</guid>
      <dc:creator>hsesterhenn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-22T21:29:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

