<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How should I implement a Splunk architecture on a 2 virtual machine, development environment? in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-should-I-implement-a-Splunk-architecture-on-a-2-virtual/m-p/232644#M45387</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm going to need a bit more clarification on what you're trying to do..&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;First off, how much data do you expect to flow in? How many sources and hosts do you have?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Splunk is designed to scale, so you have the ability to start small and grow as needed. If your indexing less than 50GB / day then you can get by with a single indexer and universal forwarders&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Lastly, what are the specs of your VM's? Physical servers will perform much better with Splunk &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2016 00:41:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>skoelpin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-11-19T00:41:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How should I implement a Splunk architecture on a 2 virtual machine, development environment?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-should-I-implement-a-Splunk-architecture-on-a-2-virtual/m-p/232640#M45383</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, we have to implement a Splunk architecture (for a development/test environment). We have 2 virtual devices, and we should replicate this set: 1 Deployment server, 1 Heavy Forwarder, a cluster of 3 Search Heads, 1 and Indexer. What do you suggest us to do?&lt;BR /&gt;
Thank you very much&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 11:33:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-should-I-implement-a-Splunk-architecture-on-a-2-virtual/m-p/232640#M45383</guid>
      <dc:creator>gianpaolodelgro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-18T11:33:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How should I implement a Splunk architecture on a 2 virtual machine, development environment?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-should-I-implement-a-Splunk-architecture-on-a-2-virtual/m-p/232641#M45384</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello @gianpaolodelgrosso , Welcome to Splunk Answers! &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;First off, can you clarify what you mean by virtual devices? Are you referring to 2 virtual machines or 2 devices which will be collecting log files/data and need to be sent to Splunk?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Assuming you're referring to 2 VM's, then read on..&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;What are the specs of your VM's? I would suggest you get physical servers since this will handle the load better, especially when you grow. Why would you want a heavy forwarder over adding another indexer? Adding more indexers gives you the ability to scale, universal forwarders almost always do the trick, and they're light weight! Lastly, how many sources/host do you suspect will be feeding into Splunk?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 13:27:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-should-I-implement-a-Splunk-architecture-on-a-2-virtual/m-p/232641#M45384</guid>
      <dc:creator>skoelpin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-18T13:27:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How should I implement a Splunk architecture on a 2 virtual machine, development environment?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-should-I-implement-a-Splunk-architecture-on-a-2-virtual/m-p/232642#M45385</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi giampaolodelgrosso,&lt;BR /&gt;
Obviously you cannot replicate your production architecture.&lt;BR /&gt;
Every way I usually don't replicate Deployment server in dev Environment.&lt;BR /&gt;
You could use your two Virtual machines For Search Head and Indexer.&lt;BR /&gt;
The problem is the Heavy Forwarder: If you cannot have another vm you could do two thimgs:&lt;BR /&gt;
Use the production Indexer also For Development and VMs one For SH and one for HF.&lt;BR /&gt;
Or better, if you have sufficient resources in at least one VM to install two Splunk instances on the first VM For SH and HG and install Indexer on the second.&lt;BR /&gt;
Bye.&lt;BR /&gt;
Giuseppe &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 13:52:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-should-I-implement-a-Splunk-architecture-on-a-2-virtual/m-p/232642#M45385</guid>
      <dc:creator>gcusello</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-18T13:52:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How should I implement a Splunk architecture on a 2 virtual machine, development environment?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-should-I-implement-a-Splunk-architecture-on-a-2-virtual/m-p/232643#M45386</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
It is 2 VM to IDE (integrated development environment, this is for test and development), we have to install there and with local sources (Database local) to replicate another enviroment. We have a design draft (also based on what you said about Heavy Forwarded):&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;VM 1:&lt;BR /&gt;
instance_1 --&amp;gt; DMC+ Deployer (SH) + Cluster Master  (IDX)&lt;BR /&gt;
instance_2 --&amp;gt; Deployment Server (Forwarders)&lt;BR /&gt;
instance_3 --&amp;gt; Universal Forwarder (HF)&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;HR /&gt;

&lt;P&gt;VM 2:&lt;BR /&gt;
instance_1 --&amp;gt; SH cluster host 1&lt;BR /&gt;
instance_2 --&amp;gt; SH cluster host 2&lt;BR /&gt;
instance_3 --&amp;gt; SH cluster host 3&lt;BR /&gt;
instance_4 --&amp;gt; IDX cluster host 1&lt;BR /&gt;
instance_5 --&amp;gt; IDX cluster host 2&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;What's your opinion? Is it okay if we install in a VM, two memebr cluster (3 search head and 2 indexer)?&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks a lot again&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 11:50:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-should-I-implement-a-Splunk-architecture-on-a-2-virtual/m-p/232643#M45386</guid>
      <dc:creator>gianpaolodelgro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-29T11:50:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How should I implement a Splunk architecture on a 2 virtual machine, development environment?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-should-I-implement-a-Splunk-architecture-on-a-2-virtual/m-p/232644#M45387</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm going to need a bit more clarification on what you're trying to do..&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;First off, how much data do you expect to flow in? How many sources and hosts do you have?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Splunk is designed to scale, so you have the ability to start small and grow as needed. If your indexing less than 50GB / day then you can get by with a single indexer and universal forwarders&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Lastly, what are the specs of your VM's? Physical servers will perform much better with Splunk &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2016 00:41:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-should-I-implement-a-Splunk-architecture-on-a-2-virtual/m-p/232644#M45387</guid>
      <dc:creator>skoelpin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-19T00:41:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

