<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic What the best strategy to discard all temporary data while testing on some forwarders? in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/What-the-best-strategy-to-discard-all-temporary-data-while/m-p/229998#M44767</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a clustered environment that includes heavy forwarders, universal forwarders, and forwarders under Windows. The development team sometimes do performance tests and these generate a lot of data that we don't want to be indexed. We could add a new rule on the heavy forwarders to send to null queue all events during the tests , but can this be done at forwarder or universal forwarder level? Do you think that there is a better way to achieve this ?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 16:10:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dsmc_adv</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-05-03T16:10:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>What the best strategy to discard all temporary data while testing on some forwarders?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/What-the-best-strategy-to-discard-all-temporary-data-while/m-p/229998#M44767</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a clustered environment that includes heavy forwarders, universal forwarders, and forwarders under Windows. The development team sometimes do performance tests and these generate a lot of data that we don't want to be indexed. We could add a new rule on the heavy forwarders to send to null queue all events during the tests , but can this be done at forwarder or universal forwarder level? Do you think that there is a better way to achieve this ?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 16:10:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/What-the-best-strategy-to-discard-all-temporary-data-while/m-p/229998#M44767</guid>
      <dc:creator>dsmc_adv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-03T16:10:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What the best strategy to discard all temporary data while testing on some forwarders?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/What-the-best-strategy-to-discard-all-temporary-data-while/m-p/229999#M44768</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Have a look at this Splunk documentation to know more about event routing and filter.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.4.0/Forwarding/Routeandfilterdatad#Filter_event_data_and_send_to_queues"&gt;http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.4.0/Forwarding/Routeandfilterdatad#Filter_event_data_and_send_to_queues&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The send to null queue can be done on universal forwarder if it's to be done without looking into individual events (purely based on index/source/sourcetype/host). If you need to look at the event data to filter, than you need to do routing/filtering in heavy forwarder/indexer&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 16:52:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/What-the-best-strategy-to-discard-all-temporary-data-while/m-p/229999#M44768</guid>
      <dc:creator>somesoni2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-03T16:52:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What the best strategy to discard all temporary data while testing on some forwarders?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/What-the-best-strategy-to-discard-all-temporary-data-while/m-p/230000#M44769</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You can have the data indexed into specific indexes or add a specific field which indicates that this is a performance test data. Then it's easy to "simply" delete this type of data.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 23:30:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/What-the-best-strategy-to-discard-all-temporary-data-while/m-p/230000#M44769</guid>
      <dc:creator>ddrillic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-03T23:30:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What the best strategy to discard all temporary data while testing on some forwarders?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/What-the-best-strategy-to-discard-all-temporary-data-while/m-p/230001#M44770</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It looks like this only can be done at hf or indexer level as I suspected, but not in universal forwarder:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;"Although similar to forwarder-based routing, queue routing can be performed by an indexer, as well as a heavy forwarder"&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 08:04:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/What-the-best-strategy-to-discard-all-temporary-data-while/m-p/230001#M44770</guid>
      <dc:creator>dsmc_adv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-04T08:04:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

