https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Is-it-expected-behavior-for-6-4-1-universal-forwarders-to-work/m-p/229946#M44760 <P>All, </P> <P>We accidentally rolled out dozens of 6.4.1 Universal Forwarders, but we have 6.3.3 indexers. To my surprise, it worked! No errors. Is this expected behavior? It's a lot of effort to downgrade our UFs, so if I am supported in this setting, I'd like to leave it. </P> Mon, 27 Jun 2016 18:31:13 GMT daniel333 2016-06-27T18:31:13Z https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Is-it-expected-behavior-for-6-4-1-universal-forwarders-to-work/m-p/229946#M44760 <P>All, </P> <P>We accidentally rolled out dozens of 6.4.1 Universal Forwarders, but we have 6.3.3 indexers. To my surprise, it worked! No errors. Is this expected behavior? It's a lot of effort to downgrade our UFs, so if I am supported in this setting, I'd like to leave it. </P> Mon, 27 Jun 2016 18:31:13 GMT https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Is-it-expected-behavior-for-6-4-1-universal-forwarders-to-work/m-p/229946#M44760 daniel333 2016-06-27T18:31:13Z https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Is-it-expected-behavior-for-6-4-1-universal-forwarders-to-work/m-p/229947#M44761 <P>You're good: <A href="https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Forwarder/6.4.1/Forwarder/Compatibilitybetweenforwardersandindexers">https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Forwarder/6.4.1/Forwarder/Compatibilitybetweenforwardersandindexers</A></P> Mon, 27 Jun 2016 18:35:02 GMT https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Is-it-expected-behavior-for-6-4-1-universal-forwarders-to-work/m-p/229947#M44761 _d_ 2016-06-27T18:35:02Z