<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How is the Splunk Heavy Forwarder used to buffer/cache until indexers come back online after getting disconnected? in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-is-the-Splunk-Heavy-Forwarder-used-to-buffer-cache-until/m-p/214695#M42241</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;There are settings in &lt;A href="http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Admin/Outputsconf"&gt;outputs.conf&lt;/A&gt; for buffers and persistent queues. You need to set them on your heavy forwarder. &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;However, a more fundamental question is - why are you using a heavy forwarder as a collection point?  There are good reasons to do that, but it also creates a possible single point of failure. Unless you have a compelling reason, perhaps you can ditch the heavy forwarder altogether and go straight to the indexers.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Or perhaps you should consider having multiple heavy forwarders, to eliminate the single point of failure problem...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 23:08:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lguinn2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-20T23:08:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How is the Splunk Heavy Forwarder used to buffer/cache until indexers come back online after getting disconnected?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-is-the-Splunk-Heavy-Forwarder-used-to-buffer-cache-until/m-p/214693#M42239</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;All, &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I have a Splunk heavy forwarder collecting data from various endpoints, which then passes up to the Indexers. We recently had a config error that disconnected the HF from the IDX for a few hours. Some data was lost, some was not. &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;We have PLENTY of disk space on Heavy Forwarders and our understanding was the HF would buffer/cache until the indexers came online. This does not seem to be true. Or was there a setting I simply missed? &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;thanks in advance, &lt;BR /&gt;
-Daniel &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 22:56:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-is-the-Splunk-Heavy-Forwarder-used-to-buffer-cache-until/m-p/214693#M42239</guid>
      <dc:creator>daniel333</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-20T22:56:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How is the Splunk Heavy Forwarder used to buffer/cache until indexers come back online after getting disconnected?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-is-the-Splunk-Heavy-Forwarder-used-to-buffer-cache-until/m-p/214694#M42240</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Depending on how you do syslog/ports, any break in the chain drops events.  I am pretty sure this is your situation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 23:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-is-the-Splunk-Heavy-Forwarder-used-to-buffer-cache-until/m-p/214694#M42240</guid>
      <dc:creator>woodcock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-20T23:04:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How is the Splunk Heavy Forwarder used to buffer/cache until indexers come back online after getting disconnected?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-is-the-Splunk-Heavy-Forwarder-used-to-buffer-cache-until/m-p/214695#M42241</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There are settings in &lt;A href="http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Admin/Outputsconf"&gt;outputs.conf&lt;/A&gt; for buffers and persistent queues. You need to set them on your heavy forwarder. &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;However, a more fundamental question is - why are you using a heavy forwarder as a collection point?  There are good reasons to do that, but it also creates a possible single point of failure. Unless you have a compelling reason, perhaps you can ditch the heavy forwarder altogether and go straight to the indexers.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Or perhaps you should consider having multiple heavy forwarders, to eliminate the single point of failure problem...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 23:08:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-is-the-Splunk-Heavy-Forwarder-used-to-buffer-cache-until/m-p/214695#M42241</guid>
      <dc:creator>lguinn2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-20T23:08:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

