<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Assets,csv nt_host in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Assets-csv-nt-host/m-p/209486#M41264</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;...a million years later....&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Here Splunk says that one of the fields ( ip | mac | nt_host | dns) is required. So I believe as long as you have ONE of the other fields nt_hosts isn't required. With that being said I have the same question. It sounds like this will function but would it hurt to put the Linux server's hostnames there for reference?  &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/ES/4.7.0/Admin/Formatassetoridentitylist#Asset_lookup_header" target="_blank"&gt;http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/ES/4.7.0/Admin/Formatassetoridentitylist#Asset_lookup_header&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:52:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jpeoples</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-09-29T13:52:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Assets,csv nt_host</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Assets-csv-nt-host/m-p/209484#M41262</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;All, &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Building my Assets.csv file for ES. Just curious about the nt_host field. Is this required? For example with my Linux hosts so I need to go ahead and still fill it out with the Linux server name? Harmful to do so? Harmful to not?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2016 02:35:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Assets-csv-nt-host/m-p/209484#M41262</guid>
      <dc:creator>daniel333</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-20T02:35:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Assets,csv nt_host</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Assets-csv-nt-host/m-p/209485#M41263</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have ours populated with nix hosts. Not harmful at all.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2016 14:39:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Assets-csv-nt-host/m-p/209485#M41263</guid>
      <dc:creator>timm747747</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-06T14:39:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Assets,csv nt_host</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Assets-csv-nt-host/m-p/209486#M41264</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;...a million years later....&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Here Splunk says that one of the fields ( ip | mac | nt_host | dns) is required. So I believe as long as you have ONE of the other fields nt_hosts isn't required. With that being said I have the same question. It sounds like this will function but would it hurt to put the Linux server's hostnames there for reference?  &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/ES/4.7.0/Admin/Formatassetoridentitylist#Asset_lookup_header" target="_blank"&gt;http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/ES/4.7.0/Admin/Formatassetoridentitylist#Asset_lookup_header&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:52:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Assets-csv-nt-host/m-p/209486#M41264</guid>
      <dc:creator>jpeoples</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-29T13:52:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

