<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Has anyone compared the performance and resource usage on a universal forwarder versus a full Splunk Enterprise install for a simple inputs.conf? in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Has-anyone-compared-the-performance-and-resource-usage-on-a/m-p/206125#M40685</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;All, &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I have a couple small use cases where a full install of Splunk with the GUI disabled might be better than using a Universal Forwarder. And honestly, just curious. &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;1) Mainly some props manipulation/transforms I want to offload off my existing heavy forwarder tier since I am hardware strapped for Splunk. But the customer has surplus resources left and right. &lt;BR /&gt;
2) And maybe some scripted actions on the server itself, not sure about that just curious&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Has anyone ever done this? &lt;BR /&gt;
Anything obvious silly there I am missing? &lt;BR /&gt;
Has anyone compared the base UF vs base Full install overhead for a simple inputs.conf?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 01:38:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>daniel333</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-04-15T01:38:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Has anyone compared the performance and resource usage on a universal forwarder versus a full Splunk Enterprise install for a simple inputs.conf?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Has-anyone-compared-the-performance-and-resource-usage-on-a/m-p/206125#M40685</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;All, &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I have a couple small use cases where a full install of Splunk with the GUI disabled might be better than using a Universal Forwarder. And honestly, just curious. &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;1) Mainly some props manipulation/transforms I want to offload off my existing heavy forwarder tier since I am hardware strapped for Splunk. But the customer has surplus resources left and right. &lt;BR /&gt;
2) And maybe some scripted actions on the server itself, not sure about that just curious&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Has anyone ever done this? &lt;BR /&gt;
Anything obvious silly there I am missing? &lt;BR /&gt;
Has anyone compared the base UF vs base Full install overhead for a simple inputs.conf?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 01:38:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Has-anyone-compared-the-performance-and-resource-usage-on-a/m-p/206125#M40685</guid>
      <dc:creator>daniel333</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-15T01:38:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Has anyone compared the performance and resource usage on a universal forwarder versus a full Splunk Enterprise install for a simple inputs.conf?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Has-anyone-compared-the-performance-and-resource-usage-on-a/m-p/206126#M40686</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If my testing (which I'll admit was limited but was at least cursory) was correct, most of the load in Splunk is generated by "what you are doing."  Given a UF and a full install configured with the same inputs and reading the same files, the difference should be relatively minor.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 02:31:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Has-anyone-compared-the-performance-and-resource-usage-on-a/m-p/206126#M40686</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richfez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-15T02:31:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

