<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Relation between fishbuckets and check point files. in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Relation-between-fishbuckets-and-check-point-files/m-p/189318#M37715</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Splunkers, &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I know that Universal Forwarder monitoring windows eventlog has a check point file and fishbuckets.&lt;BR /&gt;
In re-transferring data to the Indexer, we have two cases.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;For example, it seems to be two cases.&lt;BR /&gt;
1.  Delete fishbuckets, not changing check points files.&lt;BR /&gt;
2.  Change check point files, not deleting fishbuckets.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Case 1, in default setting, UF seems to transfer all local eventlog to Indexer.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Case 2, we actually can set a record ID from which start to read.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;But I cannot understand these logic.&lt;BR /&gt;
Does UF read check point file and start transferring data irrelevant to fishbuckets ?&lt;BR /&gt;
Or does UF not transfer data in spite of changing the check point file because of fishbuckets ?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thak you for your help.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2013 00:27:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sunrise</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-12-25T00:27:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Relation between fishbuckets and check point files.</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Relation-between-fishbuckets-and-check-point-files/m-p/189318#M37715</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Splunkers, &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I know that Universal Forwarder monitoring windows eventlog has a check point file and fishbuckets.&lt;BR /&gt;
In re-transferring data to the Indexer, we have two cases.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;For example, it seems to be two cases.&lt;BR /&gt;
1.  Delete fishbuckets, not changing check points files.&lt;BR /&gt;
2.  Change check point files, not deleting fishbuckets.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Case 1, in default setting, UF seems to transfer all local eventlog to Indexer.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Case 2, we actually can set a record ID from which start to read.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;But I cannot understand these logic.&lt;BR /&gt;
Does UF read check point file and start transferring data irrelevant to fishbuckets ?&lt;BR /&gt;
Or does UF not transfer data in spite of changing the check point file because of fishbuckets ?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thak you for your help.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2013 00:27:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Relation-between-fishbuckets-and-check-point-files/m-p/189318#M37715</guid>
      <dc:creator>sunrise</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-25T00:27:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Relation between fishbuckets and check point files.</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Relation-between-fishbuckets-and-check-point-files/m-p/189319#M37716</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Checkpoint files are used to track position in the windows event logs. The fish bucket is used to track position in files (read by the monitor:// input processor). A particular input type uses either one or the other.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2013 04:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Relation-between-fishbuckets-and-check-point-files/m-p/189319#M37716</guid>
      <dc:creator>gkanapathy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-25T04:13:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

