<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Securing communcation between Universal Forwarder and Heavy Forwarder in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Securing-communcation-between-Universal-Forwarder-and-Heavy/m-p/185869#M37223</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the quick response. I will search for the .conf 2014 discussion, as well.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 14:50:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rwcbp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-07-01T14:50:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Securing communcation between Universal Forwarder and Heavy Forwarder</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Securing-communcation-between-Universal-Forwarder-and-Heavy/m-p/185867#M37221</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Splunk Docs do not specifically state that default encryption is active between Universal Forwarders and Heavy Forwarders, is it?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Also, if a self-signed or third party cert is used for this environment, is the Universal Forwarder the "client" of the Heavy Forwarder in this example?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 14:37:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Securing-communcation-between-Universal-Forwarder-and-Heavy/m-p/185867#M37221</guid>
      <dc:creator>rwcbp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-01T14:37:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Securing communcation between Universal Forwarder and Heavy Forwarder</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Securing-communcation-between-Universal-Forwarder-and-Heavy/m-p/185868#M37222</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;By default, no, there is no crypto between forwarders and indexers or forwarders and intermediate forwarders.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;If you choose to do encryption, the certificate situation is up to you.  However, I would STRONGLY suggest use of either a private CA or 3rd party certs.  Don't use the default self-signed stuff.  George Starcher and I did a .conf talk on this subject at .conf 2014, should be able to find it in the talk archives.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;In the case of   UF -&amp;gt; HF -&amp;gt; Indexer, the  UF is an "SSL Client", the HF Is both an SSL "server" (toward the UF) and an SSL "client" (toward the indexer), and the indexer is an SSL "server"&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 14:47:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Securing-communcation-between-Universal-Forwarder-and-Heavy/m-p/185868#M37222</guid>
      <dc:creator>dwaddle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-01T14:47:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Securing communcation between Universal Forwarder and Heavy Forwarder</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Securing-communcation-between-Universal-Forwarder-and-Heavy/m-p/185869#M37223</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the quick response. I will search for the .conf 2014 discussion, as well.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 14:50:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Securing-communcation-between-Universal-Forwarder-and-Heavy/m-p/185869#M37223</guid>
      <dc:creator>rwcbp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-01T14:50:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Securing communcation between Universal Forwarder and Heavy Forwarder</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Securing-communcation-between-Universal-Forwarder-and-Heavy/m-p/185870#M37224</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just remembered, I posted a copy of the slides post .conf with some followup comments based on audience questions at &lt;A href="http://duanewaddle.com/splunk-conf-2014/"&gt;http://duanewaddle.com/splunk-conf-2014/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 14:55:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Securing-communcation-between-Universal-Forwarder-and-Heavy/m-p/185870#M37224</guid>
      <dc:creator>dwaddle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-01T14:55:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Securing communcation between Universal Forwarder and Heavy Forwarder</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Securing-communcation-between-Universal-Forwarder-and-Heavy/m-p/185871#M37225</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Much appreciated. Certainly saves time.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 15:02:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Securing-communcation-between-Universal-Forwarder-and-Heavy/m-p/185871#M37225</guid>
      <dc:creator>rwcbp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-01T15:02:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Securing communcation between Universal Forwarder and Heavy Forwarder</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Securing-communcation-between-Universal-Forwarder-and-Heavy/m-p/185872#M37226</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In the case of UF -&amp;gt; HF -&amp;gt; Indexer, the UF is an "SSL Client", the HF Is both an SSL "server" (toward the UF) and an SSL "client" (toward the indexer), and the indexer is an SSL "server"...&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;we are also deploying the same setup, but HF is in cluster mode for LB with fail over setup. &lt;BR /&gt;
can anyone help the SSL certificate configuration of all (UF,HF and IDX) input.conf and output,conf. We are deployed 3rd party pki certificate.  using Common name fro all Forwarders,IDX and DS&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I need below answers for below queries &lt;BR /&gt;
1. Have to initiate separate certificate for all forwarders with rootpath ? or same has to use in ssl client and server&lt;BR /&gt;
2. please share sample configuration &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 04:07:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Securing-communcation-between-Universal-Forwarder-and-Heavy/m-p/185872#M37226</guid>
      <dc:creator>karthikeyan_k14</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-08T04:07:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

