<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Running a Universal Forwarder on the same server as the Enterprise server. in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Running-a-Universal-Forwarder-on-the-same-server-as-the/m-p/127674#M26244</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I see no reason why not, there's a few pitfalls though: Make sure you're disciplined about paths and ports.&lt;BR /&gt;
By default, full Splunk installs end up in &lt;CODE&gt;/opt/splunk&lt;/CODE&gt; and UF installs end up in &lt;CODE&gt;/opt/splunkforwarder&lt;/CODE&gt;, which can lead to tab completion mistakes if you're not careful.&lt;BR /&gt;
Similarly, by default both will try to use port 8089 for their management port - that needs to be changed on at least one obviously. Here Splunk's quite helpful by asking you to change it on first launch if the default is in use already.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:00:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>martin_mueller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-04-10T21:00:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Running a Universal Forwarder on the same server as the Enterprise server.</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Running-a-Universal-Forwarder-on-the-same-server-as-the/m-p/127673#M26243</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a Solaris 10 standalone server. Can I run a Universal Forwarder (6.0.2) on the same server that Enterprise (also 6.0.2) is running on with the forwarder sending to Enterprise on this same server? This is for testing/learning/evaluation and not expected to be the final configuration. I looked through the 'Answers' area but came up blank.  Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:52:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Running-a-Universal-Forwarder-on-the-same-server-as-the/m-p/127673#M26243</guid>
      <dc:creator>acsplunkuser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-10T20:52:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Running a Universal Forwarder on the same server as the Enterprise server.</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Running-a-Universal-Forwarder-on-the-same-server-as-the/m-p/127674#M26244</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I see no reason why not, there's a few pitfalls though: Make sure you're disciplined about paths and ports.&lt;BR /&gt;
By default, full Splunk installs end up in &lt;CODE&gt;/opt/splunk&lt;/CODE&gt; and UF installs end up in &lt;CODE&gt;/opt/splunkforwarder&lt;/CODE&gt;, which can lead to tab completion mistakes if you're not careful.&lt;BR /&gt;
Similarly, by default both will try to use port 8089 for their management port - that needs to be changed on at least one obviously. Here Splunk's quite helpful by asking you to change it on first launch if the default is in use already.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:00:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Running-a-Universal-Forwarder-on-the-same-server-as-the/m-p/127674#M26244</guid>
      <dc:creator>martin_mueller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-10T21:00:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Running a Universal Forwarder on the same server as the Enterprise server.</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Running-a-Universal-Forwarder-on-the-same-server-as-the/m-p/127675#M26245</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the help. And after spending time in the online documentation I came across this note in the section explaining the Universal Forwarder:&lt;BR /&gt;
Note: The universal forwarder is a separate executable from full Splunk Enterprise. Instances of full Splunk Enterprise and the universal forwarder can co-exist on the same system.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:27:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Running-a-Universal-Forwarder-on-the-same-server-as-the/m-p/127675#M26245</guid>
      <dc:creator>acsplunkuser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-11T13:27:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Running a Universal Forwarder on the same server as the Enterprise server.</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Running-a-Universal-Forwarder-on-the-same-server-as-the/m-p/127676#M26246</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I realize that this is a very late answer... but, I would like to add that, in addition to the above, if you are running Linux&amp;lt;=6.9 (just not sure about 7.x)... AND you "enable boot-start"... Splunk UF and Splunk Enterprise have the same name.  In other words , I had to modify the name of the forwarder script in init.d and manually add the script to chkconfig.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:31:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Running-a-Universal-Forwarder-on-the-same-server-as-the/m-p/127676#M26246</guid>
      <dc:creator>markakirkland</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-28T15:31:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

