<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Simple forwarder encryption in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Simple-forwarder-encryption/m-p/117275#M24422</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;What you need is in the Splunk documentation at &lt;A href="http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Security/Aboutsecuringdatafromforwarders"&gt;http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Security/Aboutsecuringdatafromforwarders&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 16:51:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>starcher</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-03-27T16:51:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Simple forwarder encryption</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Simple-forwarder-encryption/m-p/117274#M24421</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to configure a universal forwarder to encrypt WITHOUT requiring mutual auth? Like how most browsers work with HTTPS sites? Don't need to authenticate the client just prevent eavesdropping.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 16:44:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Simple-forwarder-encryption/m-p/117274#M24421</guid>
      <dc:creator>defaultdeny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-27T16:44:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simple forwarder encryption</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Simple-forwarder-encryption/m-p/117275#M24422</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What you need is in the Splunk documentation at &lt;A href="http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Security/Aboutsecuringdatafromforwarders"&gt;http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Security/Aboutsecuringdatafromforwarders&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 16:51:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Simple-forwarder-encryption/m-p/117275#M24422</guid>
      <dc:creator>starcher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-27T16:51:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simple forwarder encryption</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Simple-forwarder-encryption/m-p/117276#M24423</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This does not answer my question. Question was answered via IRC by bosburn. The answer is that Splunk does not support this simple mode of encryption. I propose that this feature be added. Something like UseSSL = 1 instead of having to drop a client cert and configure a password on all end-points.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 17:49:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Simple-forwarder-encryption/m-p/117276#M24423</guid>
      <dc:creator>defaultdeny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-27T17:49:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simple forwarder encryption</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Simple-forwarder-encryption/m-p/117277#M24424</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes and no.  Total agreement that &lt;CODE&gt;useSSL=1&lt;/CODE&gt; would be ideal.  When a forwarder is set up to use SSL, providing a certificate to authenticate with is the only way to enable SSL.  BUT, the indexer-side's inputs.conf decides whether a client certificate is actually needed to authenticate or not.  I would like to see the forwarder side decouple "I would like to use SSL" from "Here is my client certificate"...&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Also Brian rocks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2016 17:46:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Simple-forwarder-encryption/m-p/117277#M24424</guid>
      <dc:creator>dwaddle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-07T17:46:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simple forwarder encryption</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Simple-forwarder-encryption/m-p/117278#M24425</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;plus 1 - on useSSL=1 managing certs in a large forwarder environment is not much fun&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 13:17:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Simple-forwarder-encryption/m-p/117278#M24425</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebaileytu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-01T13:17:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

