<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Indexer volume unbalanced in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Indexer-volume-unbalanced/m-p/105852#M22263</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It seems like our indexers do not properly get distributed load in our cluster according to our volume report alerts, it seems rather unbalanced and varies per day.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;One example:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;&amp;gt; splunk1-d1-inf    18367.6698217417
&amp;gt; splunk2-d2-inf    19339.4671251025
&amp;gt; splunk3-d1-inf    32423.2436867686
&amp;gt; splunk4-d2-inf    19686.7210809250
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Another example:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;splunk-w1-inf53  13694.9359103119
splunk2-w2-inf54 32902.3739299938
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Currently we use a RR record on pairs of intermediate forwarders that then forward to a RR record of our indexers.&lt;BR /&gt;
At the splunk conf i heard it might be because large data from certain hosts might keep a filehandle open to a specific indexer/intermediate forwarder. &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Some people mentioned it be best to use individual IPS in outputs.conf to our intermediate fwrds/indexers instead of our RR DNS records?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:39:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sonicZ</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-10-29T18:39:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Indexer volume unbalanced</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Indexer-volume-unbalanced/m-p/105852#M22263</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It seems like our indexers do not properly get distributed load in our cluster according to our volume report alerts, it seems rather unbalanced and varies per day.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;One example:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;&amp;gt; splunk1-d1-inf    18367.6698217417
&amp;gt; splunk2-d2-inf    19339.4671251025
&amp;gt; splunk3-d1-inf    32423.2436867686
&amp;gt; splunk4-d2-inf    19686.7210809250
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Another example:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;splunk-w1-inf53  13694.9359103119
splunk2-w2-inf54 32902.3739299938
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Currently we use a RR record on pairs of intermediate forwarders that then forward to a RR record of our indexers.&lt;BR /&gt;
At the splunk conf i heard it might be because large data from certain hosts might keep a filehandle open to a specific indexer/intermediate forwarder. &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Some people mentioned it be best to use individual IPS in outputs.conf to our intermediate fwrds/indexers instead of our RR DNS records?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:39:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Indexer-volume-unbalanced/m-p/105852#M22263</guid>
      <dc:creator>sonicZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-29T18:39:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Indexer volume unbalanced</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Indexer-volume-unbalanced/m-p/105853#M22264</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The preferred way is to specify all of the available indexer addresses in the outputs.conf. This allows the forwarder to utilize its load-balancing algorithms to more evenly balance the load. The RR DNS approach tends to develop an affinity between the forwarder and the indexer to which it connects; the forwarder doesn't realize that it needs to be looking for a new host to connect to.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 02:26:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Indexer-volume-unbalanced/m-p/105853#M22264</guid>
      <dc:creator>sowings</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-01T02:26:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Indexer volume unbalanced</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Indexer-volume-unbalanced/m-p/105854#M22265</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;See also &lt;A href="http://splunk-base.splunk.com/answers/62908/universal-forwarder-not-load-balancing-to-indexers"&gt;this answer&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 02:28:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Indexer-volume-unbalanced/m-p/105854#M22265</guid>
      <dc:creator>sowings</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-01T02:28:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Indexer volume unbalanced</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Indexer-volume-unbalanced/m-p/105855#M22266</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sowings thanks for the response and confirm It's what i suspected. we have many agents ill probably have to update them all with puppet since we have no deployment server.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 21:59:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Indexer-volume-unbalanced/m-p/105855#M22266</guid>
      <dc:creator>sonicZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-02T21:59:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

