<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: splunk-perfmon.path (sic?) in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/splunk-perfmon-path-sic/m-p/105562#M22239</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I dont think its a trick or a typo.  Its very similar to having a bat or sh file referance another path and excutable.  If you notice that scripted input referances [script://$SPLUNK_HOME\bin\scripts\splunk-perfmon.path] and splunk-perfmon.path referances $SPLUNK_HOME\bin\splunk-perfmon.exe.  I've seen this done in a few TAs.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;You could enter the splunk-perfmon.exe path directly, but you have have a script change the return data or formatting with your script.  I think scripted inputs are done this way for consistancy when referancing executables. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:11:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bmacias84</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-10-29T16:11:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>splunk-perfmon.path (sic?)</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/splunk-perfmon-path-sic/m-p/105561#M22238</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;As I'm installing TA's on windows hosts, I see that the PerformanceMonitor source is specified as&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;[script://$SPLUNK_HOME\bin\scripts\splunk-perfmon.path]
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The file itself is called &lt;CODE&gt;splunk-perfmon.exe&lt;/CODE&gt;. Is this intentional - as in disabling accidental usage of the exe, a Splunk trick or a typo?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:20:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/splunk-perfmon-path-sic/m-p/105561#M22238</guid>
      <dc:creator>echalex</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-29T15:20:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: splunk-perfmon.path (sic?)</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/splunk-perfmon-path-sic/m-p/105562#M22239</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I dont think its a trick or a typo.  Its very similar to having a bat or sh file referance another path and excutable.  If you notice that scripted input referances [script://$SPLUNK_HOME\bin\scripts\splunk-perfmon.path] and splunk-perfmon.path referances $SPLUNK_HOME\bin\splunk-perfmon.exe.  I've seen this done in a few TAs.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;You could enter the splunk-perfmon.exe path directly, but you have have a script change the return data or formatting with your script.  I think scripted inputs are done this way for consistancy when referancing executables. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:11:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/splunk-perfmon-path-sic/m-p/105562#M22239</guid>
      <dc:creator>bmacias84</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-29T16:11:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: splunk-perfmon.path (sic?)</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/splunk-perfmon-path-sic/m-p/105563#M22240</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, it is indeed not a typo or trick. I was staring myself blind at the &lt;CODE&gt;splunk-perfmon.exe&lt;/CODE&gt; in &lt;CODE&gt;$SPLUNK_HOME/bin&lt;/CODE&gt; and did not see that the conf actually points to the subdirectory &lt;CODE&gt;scripts&lt;/CODE&gt;, which includes the &lt;CODE&gt;.path&lt;/CODE&gt;-scripts.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:53:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/splunk-perfmon-path-sic/m-p/105563#M22240</guid>
      <dc:creator>echalex</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-30T07:53:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

