<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How to handle Windows 2008 event log descriptive text with a universal forwarder in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-to-handle-Windows-2008-event-log-descriptive-text-with-a/m-p/97890#M20426</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;You can also do "sendCookedData = false" on the SUF and then work on the events on the indexer or heavy forwarder.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:04:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ephemeric</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-23T15:04:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How to handle Windows 2008 event log descriptive text with a universal forwarder</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-to-handle-Windows-2008-event-log-descriptive-text-with-a/m-p/97885#M20421</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The crazily verbose descriptive text that's appended to the end of many Windows Server 2008 events has been covered in Splunk Answer &lt;A href="http://splunk-base.splunk.com/answers/4752/disabling-or-removing-extra-description-text-in-windows-2008-event-logs/7892"&gt;Disabling or removing extra description text in Windows 2008 event logs?&lt;/A&gt;, with an excellent answer by jervin involving using SEDCMD in props.conf to trim the description off.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The problem is, per &lt;A href="http://www.splunk.com/base/Documentation/4.2.1/Admin/Configurationparametersandthedatapipeline"&gt;Configuration parameters and the data pipeline&lt;/A&gt;, a universal forwarder can't do a SEDCMD. It seems to me like you couldn't use a universal forwarder on a Windows 2008 server without absolutely murdering your Splunk license with all that descriptive text.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Can anyone think of a way around this problem?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 18:08:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-to-handle-Windows-2008-event-log-descriptive-text-with-a/m-p/97885#M20421</guid>
      <dc:creator>gpullis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-09T18:08:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to handle Windows 2008 event log descriptive text with a universal forwarder</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-to-handle-Windows-2008-event-log-descriptive-text-with-a/m-p/97886#M20422</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You could implement the configuration where the data is being parsed, most likely the indexer, and it would also alter the data in the same way. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 18:53:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-to-handle-Windows-2008-event-log-descriptive-text-with-a/m-p/97886#M20422</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbsplunk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-09T18:53:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to handle Windows 2008 event log descriptive text with a universal forwarder</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-to-handle-Windows-2008-event-log-descriptive-text-with-a/m-p/97887#M20423</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Correct, but then doesn't the unparsed data as it comes into the indexer count against my license?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 18:55:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-to-handle-Windows-2008-event-log-descriptive-text-with-a/m-p/97887#M20423</guid>
      <dc:creator>gpullis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-09T18:55:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to handle Windows 2008 event log descriptive text with a universal forwarder</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-to-handle-Windows-2008-event-log-descriptive-text-with-a/m-p/97888#M20424</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks! Also, according to &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://splunk-base.splunk.com/answers/7171/sed-cmd-and-indexing-volume-count/7172"&gt;http://splunk-base.splunk.com/answers/7171/sed-cmd-and-indexing-volume-count/7172&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Since parsing happens before indexing, what SEDCMD chops off -- even on the indexer -- is not counted towards the license.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 19:00:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-to-handle-Windows-2008-event-log-descriptive-text-with-a/m-p/97888#M20424</guid>
      <dc:creator>gpullis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-09T19:00:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to handle Windows 2008 event log descriptive text with a universal forwarder</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-to-handle-Windows-2008-event-log-descriptive-text-with-a/m-p/97889#M20425</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Make the forwarder a "Heavy Forwarder" and do the work before the data is sent to the Indexer. The tradeoff is that your forwarder will have higher CPU utilization.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I love the descriptive text when I'm scrolling through an actual event log, but I don't need to index or store ten gazillion copies of MSFT boilerplate in my Splunk db.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I'm literally in the middle of doing this so thanks for your link to the SEDCMD article!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:46:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-to-handle-Windows-2008-event-log-descriptive-text-with-a/m-p/97889#M20425</guid>
      <dc:creator>rnagheereddy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-06T15:46:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to handle Windows 2008 event log descriptive text with a universal forwarder</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-to-handle-Windows-2008-event-log-descriptive-text-with-a/m-p/97890#M20426</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You can also do "sendCookedData = false" on the SUF and then work on the events on the indexer or heavy forwarder.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:04:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-to-handle-Windows-2008-event-log-descriptive-text-with-a/m-p/97890#M20426</guid>
      <dc:creator>ephemeric</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-23T15:04:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to handle Windows 2008 event log descriptive text with a universal forwarder</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-to-handle-Windows-2008-event-log-descriptive-text-with-a/m-p/97891#M20427</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What is the resource cost of doing this on the indexers? After all, in a Windows heavy environment, some of the events with these descriptions probably make up the bulk of logged security events.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Is there a way of doing it on an intermediary step? Ie. putting an intermediary forwarder between the Windows forwarders and the indexers?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 12:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/How-to-handle-Windows-2008-event-log-descriptive-text-with-a/m-p/97891#M20427</guid>
      <dc:creator>reedmohn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-06-12T12:37:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

