<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Same file but different extension in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Same-file-but-different-extension/m-p/81511#M16825</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The best would be to set your whitelist/blacklists to only grab .log files and ignore .log.gz, that said Splunk should open the file then determine based upon checksums that it's already been read.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:54:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mikelanghorst</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-22T16:54:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Same file but different extension</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Same-file-but-different-extension/m-p/81510#M16824</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Short question.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;i have a directory that contains log files that look somethign liek this:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;aaa.2012-05-22.log&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;but the system will compress them up after they go cold i.e. &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;aaa.2012-05-22.log.gz&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;in this case, will Splunk detect this new file in the directory that its monitoring and index the file? or would it still ignore it as the exact same log has already been indexed before. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:45:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Same-file-but-different-extension/m-p/81510#M16824</guid>
      <dc:creator>attgjh1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-22T07:45:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Same file but different extension</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Same-file-but-different-extension/m-p/81511#M16825</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The best would be to set your whitelist/blacklists to only grab .log files and ignore .log.gz, that said Splunk should open the file then determine based upon checksums that it's already been read.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:54:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Same-file-but-different-extension/m-p/81511#M16825</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikelanghorst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-22T16:54:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

