<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Should I split inputs and props into distinct apps? in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Should-I-split-inputs-and-props-into-distinct-apps/m-p/759053#M120322</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/270618"&gt;@spl_aficionado&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;separating inpus and props is a recommended PS best practices even if I don't understand why to use two different add-ons.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/231884"&gt;@PickleRick&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;said, I use two custom apps only on UFs, on HFs I use to create a custom app for inputs and I use standard (from Splunkbase) TAs for the props, so I can easily upgrade them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ciao.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 06:30:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gcusello</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-03-06T06:30:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Should I split inputs and props into distinct apps?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Should-I-split-inputs-and-props-into-distinct-apps/m-p/759028#M120315</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Our custom here is to create a props app and an inputs app. The inputs apps are being deployed on the on-prem side, while for the props apps we usually deploy on the cloud. I wonder whether to consolidate inputs and props into one app for simpler administration.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 17:27:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Should-I-split-inputs-and-props-into-distinct-apps/m-p/759028#M120315</guid>
      <dc:creator>spl_aficionado</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-05T17:27:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should I split inputs and props into distinct apps?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Should-I-split-inputs-and-props-into-distinct-apps/m-p/759030#M120316</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I vote in favor of maintaining the split - not as an input/props split, but as an on-prem/cloud split.&amp;nbsp; Inputs that work on-prem probably don't work (at least not the same) in the cloud and props in one may not apply to the other.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 17:45:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Should-I-split-inputs-and-props-into-distinct-apps/m-p/759030#M120316</guid>
      <dc:creator>richgalloway</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-05T17:45:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should I split inputs and props into distinct apps?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Should-I-split-inputs-and-props-into-distinct-apps/m-p/759032#M120318</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/213957"&gt;@richgalloway&lt;/a&gt;, in general, would you combine the inputs and props apps?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 17:47:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Should-I-split-inputs-and-props-into-distinct-apps/m-p/759032#M120318</guid>
      <dc:creator>spl_aficionado</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-05T17:47:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should I split inputs and props into distinct apps?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Should-I-split-inputs-and-props-into-distinct-apps/m-p/759034#M120319</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would consider putting inputs.conf and the props associated with the sourcetypes in those inputs into the same app.&amp;nbsp; I also would ensure all inputs are disabled by default.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If multiple input.conf file reference the same sourcetype (like "syslog", to use a bad example) then I would move the props to a separate app.&amp;nbsp; This should help future maintainers realize the props are not specific to any one input.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 18:27:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Should-I-split-inputs-and-props-into-distinct-apps/m-p/759034#M120319</guid>
      <dc:creator>richgalloway</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-05T18:27:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should I split inputs and props into distinct apps?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Should-I-split-inputs-and-props-into-distinct-apps/m-p/759048#M120320</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is a kinda "religious" question. There are some people who prefer having more small apps, others like having bigger, consolidated ones. I'd probably try to keep a typical add-on/app split (add-on containing the "technical" part of stuff for given solution - inputs, props and so on, app containing dashboards and such). I'd push the app with inputs disabled by default and I'd locally push an additional app enabling selected inputs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But it's not "the only right solution".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There can be exceptions - for example if the input part is heavy (like containing modular inputs with a lot of code) I could consider splitting it into another app so that it doesn't end up on SHs (and replicated in knowledge bundle to indeers).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 21:58:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Should-I-split-inputs-and-props-into-distinct-apps/m-p/759048#M120320</guid>
      <dc:creator>PickleRick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-05T21:58:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should I split inputs and props into distinct apps?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Should-I-split-inputs-and-props-into-distinct-apps/m-p/759053#M120322</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/270618"&gt;@spl_aficionado&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;separating inpus and props is a recommended PS best practices even if I don't understand why to use two different add-ons.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/231884"&gt;@PickleRick&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;said, I use two custom apps only on UFs, on HFs I use to create a custom app for inputs and I use standard (from Splunkbase) TAs for the props, so I can easily upgrade them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ciao.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 06:30:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Should-I-split-inputs-and-props-into-distinct-apps/m-p/759053#M120322</guid>
      <dc:creator>gcusello</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-06T06:30:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

