<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Why is the Tenable vulnerability time stamp off? in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-the-Tenable-vulnerability-time-stamp-off/m-p/747365#M118764</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;DATETIME_CONFIG = CURRENT != NONE&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Current set the timestamp from the Aggregation queue time.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;None in this instance sets the timestamp from the time handed over to Splunk by the modular input script.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Splunk then still needs to send the data to an indexer, which is where the _indextime will be set. Yes the data is cooked and time set on the HeavyForwarder but note the _indextime is NOT.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;An easy way to see this in action is to look at any of your data being ingested by DBConnect with _time being set to Current. The _indextime will usually be negative,&amp;nbsp; but every once in a while you'll see it jump to a few seconds usually due to a blocked output queue. And of course any difference between the HeavyForwarder and Indexer time will of course cause times to be off as well.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 19:43:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>aromanauskas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-02T19:43:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why is the Tenable vulnerability time stamp off?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-the-Tenable-vulnerability-time-stamp-off/m-p/747356#M118762</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We're using the Tenable Add-on for Splunk (TA-tenable) to ingest data from Tenable.io. the app's props.conf, has the following -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;[tenable:io:vuln]
DATETIME_CONFIG = NONE&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;When we run the following SPL:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;index=tenable sourcetype="tenable:io:vuln"
| eval lag = _indextime - _time&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are seeing non-zero lag values, even though I expect the lag to be zero if _time truly equals _indextime.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If anything, I would expect DATETIME_CONFIG = CURRENT, what am I missing?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 17:35:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-the-Tenable-vulnerability-time-stamp-off/m-p/747356#M118762</guid>
      <dc:creator>danielbb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-02T17:35:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why is the Tenable vulnerability time stamp off?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-the-Tenable-vulnerability-time-stamp-off/m-p/747358#M118763</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's normal for _indextime to not exactly match _time since there's always a delay from event transmission and processing.&amp;nbsp; How big is the lag you see?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 17:56:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-the-Tenable-vulnerability-time-stamp-off/m-p/747358#M118763</guid>
      <dc:creator>richgalloway</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-02T17:56:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why is the Tenable vulnerability time stamp off?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-the-Tenable-vulnerability-time-stamp-off/m-p/747365#M118764</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;DATETIME_CONFIG = CURRENT != NONE&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Current set the timestamp from the Aggregation queue time.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;None in this instance sets the timestamp from the time handed over to Splunk by the modular input script.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Splunk then still needs to send the data to an indexer, which is where the _indextime will be set. Yes the data is cooked and time set on the HeavyForwarder but note the _indextime is NOT.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;An easy way to see this in action is to look at any of your data being ingested by DBConnect with _time being set to Current. The _indextime will usually be negative,&amp;nbsp; but every once in a while you'll see it jump to a few seconds usually due to a blocked output queue. And of course any difference between the HeavyForwarder and Indexer time will of course cause times to be off as well.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 19:43:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-the-Tenable-vulnerability-time-stamp-off/m-p/747365#M118764</guid>
      <dc:creator>aromanauskas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-02T19:43:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why is the Tenable vulnerability time stamp off?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-the-Tenable-vulnerability-time-stamp-off/m-p/747366#M118765</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/213957"&gt;@richgalloway&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is, why an app sets something like?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;[tenable:io:vuln]
DATETIME_CONFIG = NONE&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's what this tenable TA does, I don't get it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 20:35:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-the-Tenable-vulnerability-time-stamp-off/m-p/747366#M118765</guid>
      <dc:creator>danielbb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-02T20:35:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why is the Tenable vulnerability time stamp off?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-the-Tenable-vulnerability-time-stamp-off/m-p/747367#M118766</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;1. As&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/213957"&gt;@richgalloway&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;mentioned, a (typically small but it realy depends on the input) lag between _time and _indextime is a normal state. Or at least on its own it doesn't mean that something is wrong.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. DATETIME_CONFIG=none explicitly disables timestamp recognition. Are you sure it is what you want?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. If there is a difference between the timestamp included in the raw event and the timestamp stored in the _time field, the data is not properly onboarded. Tenable.io is a cloud service so I suppose there is some modular input which pulls the data from the cloud and pushes them to Splunk. But I have no idea whether the timestamps should be parsed by the input itself and fed "as is" to Splunk or if the data should be parsed in Splunk. Infortunately, it's a third party add-on so there can be completely everything happening inside...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 19:51:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-the-Tenable-vulnerability-time-stamp-off/m-p/747367#M118766</guid>
      <dc:creator>PickleRick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-02T19:51:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why is the Tenable vulnerability time stamp off?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-the-Tenable-vulnerability-time-stamp-off/m-p/747376#M118767</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/196884"&gt;@danielbb&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;_time is being set by the Tenable Add-on itself, using a timestamp field from the Tenable API response (e.g., last_seen, last_found).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DATETIME_CONFIG = NONE&lt;/STRONG&gt; in props.conf for tenable is &lt;STRONG&gt;intentional to prevent&lt;/STRONG&gt; Splunk from trying to re-parse _time from the event's raw data and potentially overriding the TA's carefully chosen timestamp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Prewin&lt;BR /&gt;Splunk Enthusiast | Always happy to help! If this answer helped you, please consider marking it as the solution or giving a kudos/Karma. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 04:34:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-the-Tenable-vulnerability-time-stamp-off/m-p/747376#M118767</guid>
      <dc:creator>PrewinThomas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-03T04:34:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why is the Tenable vulnerability time stamp off?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-the-Tenable-vulnerability-time-stamp-off/m-p/747413#M118768</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/28010"&gt;@PrewinThomas&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm looking at props.conf and transforms.conf of the TA and I don't see any references to last_seen and last_found. What am I missing?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 16:14:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-the-Tenable-vulnerability-time-stamp-off/m-p/747413#M118768</guid>
      <dc:creator>danielbb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-03T16:14:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

