<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Load Balancing Universal Forwarders in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Load-Balancing-Universal-Forwarders/m-p/59864#M11841</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Good question. In general, I prefer to install all forwarders as passive as possible, i.e, they do &lt;EM&gt;nothing&lt;/EM&gt; and have &lt;EM&gt;no&lt;/EM&gt; configuration except for the bare minimum necessary to update their own config from a centralized location, e.g. Splunk Deployment Server. That way, you don't have to worry about this and can easily update all your forwarders going forward.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;This hasn't yet been updated for 4.2/Universal Forwarders (as for 2011-03-16), so the specific config file package is wrong, as are the MSI installer options, but the basic principle of sending out a passive forwarder with inputs disabled, no outputs, etc., is here:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.splunk.com/wiki/Deploying_Splunk_Light_Forwarders" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.splunk.com/wiki/Deploying_Splunk_Light_Forwarders&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:26:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gkanapathy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-03-16T22:26:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Load Balancing Universal Forwarders</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Load-Balancing-Universal-Forwarders/m-p/59863#M11840</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am getting ready for a new install of Splunk.  I am going to start with version 4.2.  I would like to do a universal forwarder CLI install for the Windows servers we will be monitoring.  We are going to be setting up load balancing for the indexers.  Is there a way to specify multiple indexers during the CLI install?  I have the following switch already configured:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;RECEIVING_INDEXER="SplunkSvr01:9997"&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Can I just add a comma and then SplunkSvr02:9997?  I can't seem to find an answer anywhere in the documentation.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 02:33:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Load-Balancing-Universal-Forwarders/m-p/59863#M11840</guid>
      <dc:creator>jec013</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-16T02:33:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load Balancing Universal Forwarders</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Load-Balancing-Universal-Forwarders/m-p/59864#M11841</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good question. In general, I prefer to install all forwarders as passive as possible, i.e, they do &lt;EM&gt;nothing&lt;/EM&gt; and have &lt;EM&gt;no&lt;/EM&gt; configuration except for the bare minimum necessary to update their own config from a centralized location, e.g. Splunk Deployment Server. That way, you don't have to worry about this and can easily update all your forwarders going forward.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;This hasn't yet been updated for 4.2/Universal Forwarders (as for 2011-03-16), so the specific config file package is wrong, as are the MSI installer options, but the basic principle of sending out a passive forwarder with inputs disabled, no outputs, etc., is here:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.splunk.com/wiki/Deploying_Splunk_Light_Forwarders" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.splunk.com/wiki/Deploying_Splunk_Light_Forwarders&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:26:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Load-Balancing-Universal-Forwarders/m-p/59864#M11841</guid>
      <dc:creator>gkanapathy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-16T22:26:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load Balancing Universal Forwarders</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Load-Balancing-Universal-Forwarders/m-p/59865#M11842</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I figured out a way to accomplish this.  I created an outputs.conf file that I copied over the one installed in %SPLUNK_HOME\etc\system\local.  The new outputs.conf file had both indexers defined and load-balancing set to true.  I then stopped and started the SplunkForwarder service.  I checked both index servers that I was using for load-balancing and they were both receiving data successfully.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:34:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Load-Balancing-Universal-Forwarders/m-p/59865#M11842</guid>
      <dc:creator>jec013</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-17T00:34:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

