<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Why is frozenTimePeriodInSecs 188697600 ? in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-frozenTimePeriodInSecs-188697600/m-p/706022#M116775</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;A golden shovel award goes to you, sir/madam. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a thread from 11 years ago.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And the answer to the original question is probably "someone made a typo and mistakenly multiplied by 364 instead of 365".&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 10:08:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PickleRick</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-12-05T10:08:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why is frozenTimePeriodInSecs 188697600 ?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-frozenTimePeriodInSecs-188697600/m-p/160360#M98015</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Splunkers,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Just my interest, not a serious question.&lt;BR /&gt;
Why is frozenTimePeriodInSecs about 6 years (188697600 secs =2184 days =5.9835 years), &lt;BR /&gt;
not just 6 years ?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 11:59:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-frozenTimePeriodInSecs-188697600/m-p/160360#M98015</guid>
      <dc:creator>sunrise</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-29T11:59:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why is frozenTimePeriodInSecs 188697600 ?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-frozenTimePeriodInSecs-188697600/m-p/160361#M98016</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;yes, its about 6 time 364, maybe an approximation for the leap-years.&lt;BR /&gt;
You can redefine a new default in /local/indexes.conf if you need.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:55:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-frozenTimePeriodInSecs-188697600/m-p/160361#M98016</guid>
      <dc:creator>yannK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-29T17:55:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why is frozenTimePeriodInSecs 188697600 ?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-frozenTimePeriodInSecs-188697600/m-p/705978#M116772</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't see how leap years could have anything to do with it. A leap year has 1 more day than a regular year, so that doesn't explain why they would use 1 less day than a regular year...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 00:19:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-frozenTimePeriodInSecs-188697600/m-p/705978#M116772</guid>
      <dc:creator>mlhadmin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-05T00:19:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why is frozenTimePeriodInSecs 188697600 ?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-frozenTimePeriodInSecs-188697600/m-p/706022#M116775</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;A golden shovel award goes to you, sir/madam. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a thread from 11 years ago.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And the answer to the original question is probably "someone made a typo and mistakenly multiplied by 364 instead of 365".&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 10:08:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-frozenTimePeriodInSecs-188697600/m-p/706022#M116775</guid>
      <dc:creator>PickleRick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-05T10:08:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why is frozenTimePeriodInSecs 188697600 ?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-frozenTimePeriodInSecs-188697600/m-p/706072#M116788</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It looks like this mystery has not been solved within those 11 years though!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If your guess is correct, I guess they hadn't implemented Pull Requests yet whenever that code was added... &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face_with_tongue:"&gt;😜&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I went looking for this answer, though, because in Splunk Cloud the _audit index is set to this default value for retention, and you are unable to change the retention setting for internal indexes in Splunk Cloud, so if you have a requirement to retain audit logs for 6 years, you're technically short by 6 days!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 23:09:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-frozenTimePeriodInSecs-188697600/m-p/706072#M116788</guid>
      <dc:creator>mlhadmin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-05T23:09:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why is frozenTimePeriodInSecs 188697600 ?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-frozenTimePeriodInSecs-188697600/m-p/706111#M116794</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You can raise a case with Cloud support.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 08:47:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Why-is-frozenTimePeriodInSecs-188697600/m-p/706111#M116794</guid>
      <dc:creator>PickleRick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-06T08:47:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

