<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Specific Indexer is overused!! in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Specific-Indexer-is-overused/m-p/684811#M114251</link>
    <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;Here is excellent presentation about event distribution&lt;BR /&gt;“ Best practises for Data Collection - Richard Morgan”.&lt;BR /&gt;You could found it at least from slide share service.&lt;BR /&gt;r. Ismo</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 16:50:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>isoutamo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-04-19T16:50:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Specific Indexer is overused!!</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Specific-Indexer-is-overused/m-p/684735#M114231</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;HI, I'm working in splunk team.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Environment:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3 SH 10 IDX (1 of 10 IDX overused)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Replication factor 3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Search factor 3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could it happen that searches are continuously done only on certain indexer? I've been constantly monitoring them with top and ps -ef, and I'm seeing a lot of search operations on certain indexer. The cpu usage is roughly double... It's been going on for months. Can it be considered normal?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 02:04:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Specific-Indexer-is-overused/m-p/684735#M114231</guid>
      <dc:creator>dongwonn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-19T02:04:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Specific Indexer is overused!!</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Specific-Indexer-is-overused/m-p/684736#M114232</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/265076"&gt;@dongwonn&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe more details pls..&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) on Monitoring Console, do you see any errors / warnings&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) on the indexer clustering, do you see the buckets imbalance?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) may we know how you say -- only 1 indexer out of 10 is overused.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4) any recent changes to the indexer cluster, .. any upgrades/migrations, any new apps deployed.. etc..&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 02:12:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Specific-Indexer-is-overused/m-p/684736#M114232</guid>
      <dc:creator>inventsekar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-19T02:12:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Specific Indexer is overused!!</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Specific-Indexer-is-overused/m-p/684738#M114233</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/80737"&gt;@inventsekar&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for answer!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) I don't see any warnings in MC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) I see only 1 indexer's bucket count is about 50,000. 9 indexer's count is about 140,000 ~150,000. And each bucket size in 1 indexer is three times bigger than other indexers. So I checked bucket in terminal, i found that tsidx file's sizes are large.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) Every indexer's conf is same. This trouble continues a few months.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there anything else to check?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 04:13:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Specific-Indexer-is-overused/m-p/684738#M114233</guid>
      <dc:creator>dongwonn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-19T04:13:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Specific Indexer is overused!!</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Specific-Indexer-is-overused/m-p/684739#M114234</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Run this command to see if you have poor data ingestion balance across the indexers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;| tstats count where index=* by index splunk_server
| stats sum(count) as total dc(splunk_server) as dc_splunk_server by index&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;The dc_splunk_server field will show you how many indexers contain the data for a particular index. If you sort by count, check if the largest data counts are across all indexers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can also go a bit deeper to check the min/max/avg data count per indexer/index and see if the min or max are outside 3*stdev from average. Also checks if the data is not across all indexers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;| tstats count where index=* by index splunk_server
| stats avg(count) as avg_count min(count) as min_count max(count) as max_count stdev(count) as stdev_count dc(splunk_server) as dc_splunk_server by index
| eventstats max(dc_splunk_server) as total_splunk_servers
| where dc_splunk_server &amp;lt; total_splunk_servers OR (min_count &amp;lt; (avg_count - 3*stdev_count)) OR (max_count &amp;gt; (avg_count + 3*stdev_count))&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 03:25:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Specific-Indexer-is-overused/m-p/684739#M114234</guid>
      <dc:creator>bowesmana</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-19T03:25:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Specific Indexer is overused!!</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Specific-Indexer-is-overused/m-p/684811#M114251</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;Here is excellent presentation about event distribution&lt;BR /&gt;“ Best practises for Data Collection - Richard Morgan”.&lt;BR /&gt;You could found it at least from slide share service.&lt;BR /&gt;r. Ismo</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 16:50:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Specific-Indexer-is-overused/m-p/684811#M114251</guid>
      <dc:creator>isoutamo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-19T16:50:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Specific Indexer is overused!!</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Specific-Indexer-is-overused/m-p/684851#M114266</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Wait a second.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;9 out of 10 indexers have roughly the same number of buckets and 1 has just 1/3 of those?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And this one has significantly larger buckets?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That is strange.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With ingestion imbalance as a primary factor you should have one or a few indexers with &lt;EM&gt;bigger&lt;/EM&gt; bucket count, not smaller.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have larger buckets, I'd hazard a guess that:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) You have primary buckets on that indexer (so you have some imbalance if this indexer receives all the primaries there)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) The summaries are generated on that indexer (hence the increased size)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) The summaries are not replicated between peers (if I remember correctly, replicating summaries must be explicitly enabled)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So your indexer is overused because it has all the primaries and all summary-generating searches hit just this indexer. And probably due to size of the index(es) or the volume(s) your buckets might get frozen earlier than on other indexers.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2024 06:33:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Specific-Indexer-is-overused/m-p/684851#M114266</guid>
      <dc:creator>PickleRick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-20T06:33:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Specific Indexer is overused!!</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Specific-Indexer-is-overused/m-p/684862#M114269</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi! &lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/231884"&gt;@PickleRick&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Thank for Answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I didn't know about primary, non-primary searchable copy terms until you said.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In our operation environment, summary is rarely used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, I think we need to collect information about primary copy and find the cause.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you again!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2024 12:42:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Specific-Indexer-is-overused/m-p/684862#M114269</guid>
      <dc:creator>dongwonn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-20T12:42:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Specific Indexer is overused!!</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Specific-Indexer-is-overused/m-p/684863#M114270</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/6367"&gt;@bowesmana&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Thank for Answer!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I checked balance as SPL that you gave to me. Balance looks like not bad.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I confirmed that the major indexes are counted as many as the number of indexers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2024 12:48:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Specific-Indexer-is-overused/m-p/684863#M114270</guid>
      <dc:creator>dongwonn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-20T12:48:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Specific Indexer is overused!!</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Specific-Indexer-is-overused/m-p/684874#M114272</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You might not be explicitly using summaries but it's quite probable that you're using datamodel acceleration. And that's nothing other than summaries built on datamodel contents for given indexes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can read some basic info on summary replication here &lt;A href="https://conf.splunk.com/files/2016/slides/replication-of-summary-data-in-indexer-cluster.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://conf.splunk.com/files/2016/slides/replication-of-summary-data-in-indexer-cluster.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2024 18:16:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Specific-Indexer-is-overused/m-p/684874#M114272</guid>
      <dc:creator>PickleRick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-20T18:16:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

