<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Windows logs collection with WMI arrive with delay? in Getting Data In</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Windows-logs-collection-with-WMI-arrive-with-delay/m-p/649235#M110348</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;30-60 minutes ,...&lt;/EM&gt;is a too much delay. It should not take so long. even 3mins delay itself is unacceptable.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;on the Splunk Cloud side, there should not be much of a delay. The delay is only should be on your systems/network side.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;pls troubleshoot the networks/connections, etc and update us how it goes..&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2023 01:43:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>inventsekar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-07-05T01:43:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Windows logs collection with WMI arrive with delay?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Windows-logs-collection-with-WMI-arrive-with-delay/m-p/648469#M110243</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Splunkers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;for our customer we collect log from Windows systems. The main configuration details are:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Logs go from DCs to a dedicated HF and then to Splunk Cloud, so the flow is: DCs -&amp;gt; HF -&amp;gt; Splunk Cloud&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Due customer policy, we avoided UF and used the WMI Collection, so on HF we configured, as Data Input, the &lt;STRONG&gt;Remote event log Collection.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Configuring&lt;STRONG&gt; Remote event log Collection, &lt;/STRONG&gt;we put one DC hostname in box &lt;STRONG&gt;Collect logs from this host&lt;/STRONG&gt; and then we added the remaining ones in the box to add additional hosts. I mean: with only one Remote event Collection data inputs, we are collection logs from alla DCs, and they are 12.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;We collect following data type:
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Application&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;System&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Security&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;DNS&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;PoweShell&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Currently, we applied no blacklist and/or other filter mechanis, so we are collecting all logs from above category&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Our HF has the recommened system requirements.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yesterday we completed this configuration and started to collect logs. The issue we are facing is that logs arrive with a delay, which is always around 30-60 minutes. So, we have to understand why.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Our suspect is that we have not a single root cause, but a set and it is:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Use of WMI insted of forwarder, that could be problematic if we have multiple hosts, as stated in this &lt;A href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Is-it-possible-to-monitor-a-Windows-event-log-via-WMI-from-the/m-p/206184" target="_self"&gt;Splunk Community Thread&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Collection of all logs without filtering anything; I mean that for above categories we collect all related EventCode occurrences.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;A "burst" in sending logs, cause we started collection from all DCs in the same time&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Configured only one Remote event log Collection, but we think this have a minimum weight on performance issues.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Based on this, if all our assumptions are correct, considering that customer for sure will not enable UF installation, we thougth to:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Excluding unwanted logs with inputs.conf in HF&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Evaluate if create separate Remote event log Collection input, in worst case one for every DC.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you think guys this is fine? Our main doubt currently is: have we detected all issue causes? Are our fixes the right ones?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 18:25:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Windows-logs-collection-with-WMI-arrive-with-delay/m-p/648469#M110243</guid>
      <dc:creator>SplunkExplorer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-28T18:25:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Windows logs collection with WMI arrive with delay?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Windows-logs-collection-with-WMI-arrive-with-delay/m-p/649226#M110343</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what I have learn/heard is that use WMI only if you haven't any other options and you must collect those logs! It's much better to use UF on those nodes!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you have 12 DC nodes you probably have quite high event count (1-X kilo events/s)? Definitely you should try to filter and collect only needed event not all from those logs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;r. Ismo&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2023 20:37:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Windows-logs-collection-with-WMI-arrive-with-delay/m-p/649226#M110343</guid>
      <dc:creator>isoutamo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-04T20:37:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Windows logs collection with WMI arrive with delay?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Windows-logs-collection-with-WMI-arrive-with-delay/m-p/649235#M110348</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;30-60 minutes ,...&lt;/EM&gt;is a too much delay. It should not take so long. even 3mins delay itself is unacceptable.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;on the Splunk Cloud side, there should not be much of a delay. The delay is only should be on your systems/network side.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;pls troubleshoot the networks/connections, etc and update us how it goes..&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2023 01:43:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Windows-logs-collection-with-WMI-arrive-with-delay/m-p/649235#M110348</guid>
      <dc:creator>inventsekar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-05T01:43:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Windows logs collection with WMI arrive with delay?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Windows-logs-collection-with-WMI-arrive-with-delay/m-p/649243#M110350</link>
      <description>If this is a very busy DC there could be hundreds/thousands events per second. With this amount of event and badly designed collection it cannot work. I have seen same kind of situations couple of time where they couldn’t found any suitable solutions to collect all needed events.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2023 05:53:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Getting-Data-In/Windows-logs-collection-with-WMI-arrive-with-delay/m-p/649243#M110350</guid>
      <dc:creator>isoutamo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-05T05:53:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

