<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Splunk CIM model in Splunk Dev</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Dev/Splunk-CIM-model/m-p/529935#M9500</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure if INGEST_EVAL can be applied to DBX data.&amp;nbsp; I think it can, but am not positive.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please post a new question about your summary index problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The concept behind CIM is to use common field names among your various sourcetypes so correlation of events is easier.&amp;nbsp; CIM uses datamodels to do that, but you can do it yourself with careful onboarding (using aliases, for example).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:21:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>richgalloway</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-11-18T15:21:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Splunk CIM model</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Dev/Splunk-CIM-model/m-p/529803#M9497</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;I have currently 5-6 index setup where consider &lt;STRONG&gt;abc &lt;/STRONG&gt;as fieldname , which is extracted at index time and same fieldname is called with different name in different indexes like &lt;STRONG&gt;cde&lt;/STRONG&gt;, &lt;STRONG&gt;efg&lt;/STRONG&gt; . Now I&amp;nbsp; want to create common field name for all these different fieldnames extracted at indextime.&lt;BR /&gt;-What would be best way to achieve it and I want to take advantage of index time extracted fields?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;I checked CIM model but does not fit as per my data. so even if I created data model including all my index and then if I calculate fields to use one common name but it will not take any advantage of index time extracted fields.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 18:21:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Dev/Splunk-CIM-model/m-p/529803#M9497</guid>
      <dc:creator>ips_mandar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-17T18:21:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Splunk CIM model</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Dev/Splunk-CIM-model/m-p/529819#M9498</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;One method is to add INGEST_EVAL settings in the transforms.conf files for the various sourcetypes that write to those indexes.&amp;nbsp; For example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;[setcommonnameabc]
INGEST_EVAL commonfield=abc

[setcommonnamecde]
INGEST_EVAL commonfield=cde

[setcommonnamedef]
INGEST_EVAL commonfield=def&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 19:55:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Dev/Splunk-CIM-model/m-p/529819#M9498</guid>
      <dc:creator>richgalloway</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-17T19:55:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Splunk CIM model</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Dev/Splunk-CIM-model/m-p/529891#M9499</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/213957"&gt;@richgalloway&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;some of my index data is coming from database using db connect app. so can I apply ingest-eval on that index as well?&lt;BR /&gt;One more issue I am facing is that-&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;I have summary index (test_summary_index)&amp;nbsp; and I have &lt;STRONG&gt;abc&lt;/STRONG&gt; fieldname in summary index as well. but problem is when I set fields.conf -&lt;BR /&gt;[abc]&lt;BR /&gt;indexed=true&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;then splunk will try to search fieldname abc in metadata but it won't find any results for summary index .&lt;BR /&gt;for ex. index="test_summary_index" abc="123"&lt;BR /&gt;This query won't return any results.&lt;BR /&gt;What could be solution for this issue?&lt;BR /&gt;Can CIM be useful?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:49:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Dev/Splunk-CIM-model/m-p/529891#M9499</guid>
      <dc:creator>ips_mandar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-18T11:49:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Splunk CIM model</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Dev/Splunk-CIM-model/m-p/529935#M9500</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure if INGEST_EVAL can be applied to DBX data.&amp;nbsp; I think it can, but am not positive.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please post a new question about your summary index problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The concept behind CIM is to use common field names among your various sourcetypes so correlation of events is easier.&amp;nbsp; CIM uses datamodels to do that, but you can do it yourself with careful onboarding (using aliases, for example).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:21:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Dev/Splunk-CIM-model/m-p/529935#M9500</guid>
      <dc:creator>richgalloway</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-18T15:21:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

