<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Compatibility between forwarders and indexers in Deployment Architecture</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Compatibility-between-forwarders-and-indexers/m-p/147656#M5499</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It shouldn't be a problem to use 6.x forwarders with 5.x indexers, based on &lt;A href="http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.2.2/Forwarding/Compatibilitybetweenforwardersandindexers"&gt;this documentation&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 09:59:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jeffland</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-04-20T09:59:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Compatibility between forwarders and indexers</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Compatibility-between-forwarders-and-indexers/m-p/147654#M5497</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I could do with upgrading all our forwarders, mainly 5.0.2 on Windows to the latest forwarder build 6.2.2, the potential issue being that our indexer is 5.0.2. This will be upgraded also but not for a while, so my question is if I go ahead and upgrade the current forwarders from 5.0.2 up to 6.2.2 will they continue to work with a 5.0.2 Indexer ?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thank you &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 09:53:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Compatibility-between-forwarders-and-indexers/m-p/147654#M5497</guid>
      <dc:creator>AaronMoorcroft</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-20T09:53:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Compatibility between forwarders and indexers</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Compatibility-between-forwarders-and-indexers/m-p/147655#M5498</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi AaronMoorcroft,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;check the docs &lt;A href="http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.2.2/Forwarding/Compatibilitybetweenforwardersandindexers"&gt;http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.2.2/Forwarding/Compatibilitybetweenforwardersandindexers&lt;/A&gt; where you can find the following statement:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt; 6.x forwarders (universal/light/heavy) are backwards compatible down to 5.0.x indexers.
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps ...&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;cheers, MuS&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 09:58:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Compatibility-between-forwarders-and-indexers/m-p/147655#M5498</guid>
      <dc:creator>MuS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-20T09:58:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Compatibility between forwarders and indexers</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Compatibility-between-forwarders-and-indexers/m-p/147656#M5499</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It shouldn't be a problem to use 6.x forwarders with 5.x indexers, based on &lt;A href="http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.2.2/Forwarding/Compatibilitybetweenforwardersandindexers"&gt;this documentation&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 09:59:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Compatibility-between-forwarders-and-indexers/m-p/147656#M5499</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeffland</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-20T09:59:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Compatibility between forwarders and indexers</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Compatibility-between-forwarders-and-indexers/m-p/147657#M5500</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Meh, you were seconds faster... &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:01:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Compatibility-between-forwarders-and-indexers/m-p/147657#M5500</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeffland</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-20T10:01:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Compatibility between forwarders and indexers</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Compatibility-between-forwarders-and-indexers/m-p/147658#M5501</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That's spot on, thank you very much for that, now I guess I have some work to do :$&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:07:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Compatibility-between-forwarders-and-indexers/m-p/147658#M5501</guid>
      <dc:creator>AaronMoorcroft</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-20T10:07:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Compatibility between forwarders and indexers</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Compatibility-between-forwarders-and-indexers/m-p/147659#M5502</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;cheers pal &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:08:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Compatibility-between-forwarders-and-indexers/m-p/147659#M5502</guid>
      <dc:creator>AaronMoorcroft</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-20T10:08:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

