<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: License pools for Indexes rather than Indexers in Deployment Architecture</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/License-pools-for-Indexes-rather-than-Indexers/m-p/75155#M2594</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I also would like this functionality. We should both raise enhancement requests for it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:16:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-21T14:16:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>License pools for Indexes rather than Indexers</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/License-pools-for-Indexes-rather-than-Indexers/m-p/75152#M2591</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to setup license pools on the license master to control/allocate individual &lt;STRONG&gt;index&lt;/STRONG&gt; allowance.&lt;BR /&gt;
I can only see how to allocate Indexers to pools, rather than an individual index on that Indexer.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 01:32:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/License-pools-for-Indexes-rather-than-Indexers/m-p/75152#M2591</guid>
      <dc:creator>Damien_Dallimor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-21T01:32:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: License pools for Indexes rather than Indexers</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/License-pools-for-Indexes-rather-than-Indexers/m-p/75153#M2592</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That functionality is not presently available.  The only way to accomplish this presently would be to reserve specific indexers for explicit indexes and get the correct data to its respective indexer.  &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;HR /&gt;

&lt;P&gt;marking answer as relevant to versions 4.2 &amp;amp; 4.3, for posterity&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 02:49:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/License-pools-for-Indexes-rather-than-Indexers/m-p/75153#M2592</guid>
      <dc:creator>bwooden</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-21T02:49:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: License pools for Indexes rather than Indexers</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/License-pools-for-Indexes-rather-than-Indexers/m-p/75154#M2593</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;cheers bw.&lt;BR /&gt;
I was thinking that might be the only way forward.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 03:00:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/License-pools-for-Indexes-rather-than-Indexers/m-p/75154#M2593</guid>
      <dc:creator>Damien_Dallimor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-21T03:00:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: License pools for Indexes rather than Indexers</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/License-pools-for-Indexes-rather-than-Indexers/m-p/75155#M2594</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I also would like this functionality. We should both raise enhancement requests for it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:16:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/License-pools-for-Indexes-rather-than-Indexers/m-p/75155#M2594</guid>
      <dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-21T14:16:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: License pools for Indexes rather than Indexers</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/License-pools-for-Indexes-rather-than-Indexers/m-p/75156#M2595</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I also would like this functionality. We should both raise enhancement requests for it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:16:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/License-pools-for-Indexes-rather-than-Indexers/m-p/75156#M2595</guid>
      <dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-21T14:16:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: License pools for Indexes rather than Indexers</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/License-pools-for-Indexes-rather-than-Indexers/m-p/75157#M2596</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When this functionality will be presently in new splunk version. it makes more sense to assign license usage per index or sourcetype and doesn't impact other data collection.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 19:58:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/License-pools-for-Indexes-rather-than-Indexers/m-p/75157#M2596</guid>
      <dc:creator>sys1pmp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-30T19:58:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: License pools for Indexes rather than Indexers</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/License-pools-for-Indexes-rather-than-Indexers/m-p/75158#M2597</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does Splunk 6.x provide the capability of setting License pools for Indexes rather than Indexers?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 04:08:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/License-pools-for-Indexes-rather-than-Indexers/m-p/75158#M2597</guid>
      <dc:creator>achaudry_splunk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-10T04:08:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: License pools for Indexes rather than Indexers</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/License-pools-for-Indexes-rather-than-Indexers/m-p/75159#M2598</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Controlling license usage by index involves either data parsing or bandwidth throttling through a heavy forwarder.  The consequences are that either you will not see some data, or you will see it arrive late when such controls are in effect.  The most ideal solution is to go straight to the source.  Undesired data can be removed from the logs at the source through log level settings through the application.  Logging can be set to sparse, normal, or verbose in some applications, while in others specific fields can be toggled for logging.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 12:38:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/License-pools-for-Indexes-rather-than-Indexers/m-p/75159#M2598</guid>
      <dc:creator>alanden_splunk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-11T12:38:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: License pools for Indexes rather than Indexers</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/License-pools-for-Indexes-rather-than-Indexers/m-p/75160#M2599</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Any update on later versions?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Can we use index to specific pool?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:38:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/License-pools-for-Indexes-rather-than-Indexers/m-p/75160#M2599</guid>
      <dc:creator>ansif</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-24T14:38:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

