<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How to Utilize all core on heavy forwarder on windows os in Deployment Architecture</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/How-to-Utilize-all-core-on-heavy-forwarder-on-windows-os/m-p/502070#M24621</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi @ips_mandar,&lt;BR /&gt;
see with Splunk Monitor Console the real load on your HF and check if there are queues.&lt;BR /&gt;
If you haven't big queues, my hint is to leave defaults.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;At a first sight, I think that you don't need so much RAM on HF, but probably you have few CPUs, referring to Splunk HW reference ( &lt;A href="https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/8.0.0/Capacity/Referencehardware"&gt;https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/8.0.0/Capacity/Referencehardware&lt;/A&gt; ).&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;At the same time perform the same check on Indexer that you're sayng is very slow, probably you have to add more resources to it or add another one.&lt;BR /&gt;
Anyway, a Splunk Indexers with the correct resources (at least 12 CPUs, 12 GB RAM) it's OK for until 100 GB/day.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;But the main thing to check is storage: Splunk requires at least 800 IOPS, that means at least 8 SAS disks 15k on physical servers, on virtual servers you have to add more Indexers to parallelize indexing.&lt;BR /&gt;
You can check IOPS using Bonnie++ open source tool.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Ciao.&lt;BR /&gt;
Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 09:43:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gcusello</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-12-06T09:43:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How to Utilize all core on heavy forwarder on windows os</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/How-to-Utilize-all-core-on-heavy-forwarder-on-windows-os/m-p/502069#M24620</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have one Heavy forwarder where zip files are ingested and parsed and hardware specification of HF is 64 GB Ram and 4-core,  windows OS. I have set parallel ingestion pipeline to two. and my CPU utilization is around 60-65% and 2 cores are fully utilized while remaining two cores utilization is very less. so how could I tell splunk to utilize remaining two cores. is there any setting?&lt;BR /&gt;
also indexing of data is very slow at indexer and after continuous indexing also 15GB data is getting indexed for whole  day due to which backlog is increasing.&lt;BR /&gt;
Please help me how can I utilize all 4 cores on HF?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Note- I have one Heavy forwarder and one indexer+search Head&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 05:29:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/How-to-Utilize-all-core-on-heavy-forwarder-on-windows-os/m-p/502069#M24620</guid>
      <dc:creator>ips_mandar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-06T05:29:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to Utilize all core on heavy forwarder on windows os</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/How-to-Utilize-all-core-on-heavy-forwarder-on-windows-os/m-p/502070#M24621</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi @ips_mandar,&lt;BR /&gt;
see with Splunk Monitor Console the real load on your HF and check if there are queues.&lt;BR /&gt;
If you haven't big queues, my hint is to leave defaults.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;At a first sight, I think that you don't need so much RAM on HF, but probably you have few CPUs, referring to Splunk HW reference ( &lt;A href="https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/8.0.0/Capacity/Referencehardware"&gt;https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/8.0.0/Capacity/Referencehardware&lt;/A&gt; ).&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;At the same time perform the same check on Indexer that you're sayng is very slow, probably you have to add more resources to it or add another one.&lt;BR /&gt;
Anyway, a Splunk Indexers with the correct resources (at least 12 CPUs, 12 GB RAM) it's OK for until 100 GB/day.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;But the main thing to check is storage: Splunk requires at least 800 IOPS, that means at least 8 SAS disks 15k on physical servers, on virtual servers you have to add more Indexers to parallelize indexing.&lt;BR /&gt;
You can check IOPS using Bonnie++ open source tool.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Ciao.&lt;BR /&gt;
Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 09:43:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/How-to-Utilize-all-core-on-heavy-forwarder-on-windows-os/m-p/502070#M24621</guid>
      <dc:creator>gcusello</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-06T09:43:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to Utilize all core on heavy forwarder on windows os</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/How-to-Utilize-all-core-on-heavy-forwarder-on-windows-os/m-p/502071#M24622</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks @gcusello&lt;BR /&gt;
My indexer hardware specification is very high (384 GB Physical Memory, 32 CPU Cores) so it won't be an issue at indexer level.&lt;BR /&gt;
Yes there are queue block is happening at HF level and I did increased queue size of parsingqueue, aggqueue, aeq and typingqueue. still queue blockage is there but it's reduced than previously happening.&lt;BR /&gt;
I have suggested my client to increase few cores but they are saying since now also it is not utilizing all 4 cores on HF so what will be use of adding few more cores?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 11:09:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/How-to-Utilize-all-core-on-heavy-forwarder-on-windows-os/m-p/502071#M24622</guid>
      <dc:creator>ips_mandar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-06T11:09:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to Utilize all core on heavy forwarder on windows os</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/How-to-Utilize-all-core-on-heavy-forwarder-on-windows-os/m-p/502072#M24623</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi @ips_mandar,&lt;BR /&gt;
for Indexers check IOPS, especially if you have virtual servers!&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Anyway, do on Indexer a check with Splunk Monitor Console because you can also have 32 CPUs but if they are all taken for heavy searches, indexing will be slow!&lt;BR /&gt;
As example: one of my customers had 3 Search Heads with 16 CPUs each one but he had also a dashboard with 12 panels containing each one a real time search with 2 or 3 subsearches and this dashboard was used concurrently by 10-12 users: in Splunk each search (and subsearch) takes a CPU, so you can understand that the 48 available CPUs weren't sufficient for that load!&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;For HF, I don't think that the problem are Cores, at what level you have queue blocks?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;If you open a ticket to Splunk Support (I always do it) they surely will highlight that the number of cores of HF are less the minimal specification, this could be a tool to speak with your customer.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Ciao.&lt;BR /&gt;
Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 12:29:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/How-to-Utilize-all-core-on-heavy-forwarder-on-windows-os/m-p/502072#M24623</guid>
      <dc:creator>gcusello</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-06T12:29:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

