<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Search Head pool on RAMdisk in Deployment Architecture</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Search-Head-pool-on-RAMdisk/m-p/117293#M22915</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
As I know, search head pool needs a tremendous IOPS to operate fast. Last "good to go" configuration i've heard from splunk architect was 10k IOPS per search peer.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;If I'll setup 30GB RAMDISK with Linux tmpfs, sharing it over tuned NFS to another head and supplying it with proper rsync scripted "backend", will it sounds good?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 07:59:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ejpulsar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-10-28T07:59:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Search Head pool on RAMdisk</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Search-Head-pool-on-RAMdisk/m-p/117293#M22915</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
As I know, search head pool needs a tremendous IOPS to operate fast. Last "good to go" configuration i've heard from splunk architect was 10k IOPS per search peer.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;If I'll setup 30GB RAMDISK with Linux tmpfs, sharing it over tuned NFS to another head and supplying it with proper rsync scripted "backend", will it sounds good?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 07:59:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Search-Head-pool-on-RAMdisk/m-p/117293#M22915</guid>
      <dc:creator>ejpulsar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-28T07:59:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Search Head pool on RAMdisk</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Search-Head-pool-on-RAMdisk/m-p/117294#M22916</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm experimenting with ramdisks myself. You can't use tmpfs as Splunk throws an error but you can increase the possible ramdisk size via kernel options and use mkfs on a /dev/ramX device. In grub just edit your kernel line and append ramdisk_size=X&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.32.24 ro root=LABEL=/ rhgb quiet ramdisk_size=4000000&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;This is for a max ramdisk size of 4gb.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Then:&lt;BR /&gt;
mkfs /dev/ram0 4000000&lt;BR /&gt;
mkdir /mnt/ramdisk0&lt;BR /&gt;
mount /dev/ram0 /mnt/ramdisk0&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Interested to hear your results with the search head pool, I'm currently testing on an indexer and I am observing what appears to be blazing speed but the verdict is still out on total improvement. Will report back with more.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 03:14:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Search-Head-pool-on-RAMdisk/m-p/117294#M22916</guid>
      <dc:creator>johnebgood</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-31T03:14:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Search Head pool on RAMdisk</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Search-Head-pool-on-RAMdisk/m-p/117295#M22917</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Bump. Just wondering how this ended up working out?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 23:30:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Search-Head-pool-on-RAMdisk/m-p/117295#M22917</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lucas_K</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-26T23:30:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Search Head pool on RAMdisk</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Search-Head-pool-on-RAMdisk/m-p/117296#M22918</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi!&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Yes, we've got nearly 100k sustained IOPS on RHEL HA Storage and NFS.&lt;BR /&gt;
But this configuration is not moved to production, we've decide to stand on SSD's.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 12:26:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Search-Head-pool-on-RAMdisk/m-p/117296#M22918</guid>
      <dc:creator>ejpulsar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-29T12:26:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

