<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Multiple Deployment Server, VIP Load Balancer and NO CLIENTS in Deployment Architecture</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Multiple-Deployment-Server-VIP-Load-Balancer-and-NO-CLIENTS/m-p/519944#M17887</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This is new to me also, but after short googling sessio it seems to be working solution.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;How about LB’s sticky session setting. Is it on or off? Probably better if nodes call at lest some time to the same backend instead of changing it on every &amp;nbsp;request to different backend node even in same transaction.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;r. Ismo&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:52:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>isoutamo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-09-16T14:52:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple Deployment Server, VIP Load Balancer and NO CLIENTS</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Multiple-Deployment-Server-VIP-Load-Balancer-and-NO-CLIENTS/m-p/519924#M17883</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We setup 3 deployment servers behind a LB VIP.&amp;nbsp; We set the VIP in deploymentclient.conf but for those agents we are not seeing them check in.&amp;nbsp; We logged in locally to both a *nix and a Win machine and we can telnet to the VIP on port 8089.&amp;nbsp; The LBer shows that traffic is being distributed between all three. Also, only our original DeploymentServer is showing clients, #2 and #3 do not show any clients at all.&amp;nbsp; All serverclass.conf match and we have serverChecksum set to true in global.&amp;nbsp; All of the app files are identical.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:36:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Multiple-Deployment-Server-VIP-Load-Balancer-and-NO-CLIENTS/m-p/519924#M17883</guid>
      <dc:creator>cachexploit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-16T13:36:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple Deployment Server, VIP Load Balancer and NO CLIENTS</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Multiple-Deployment-Server-VIP-Load-Balancer-and-NO-CLIENTS/m-p/519928#M17884</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/225177"&gt;@cachexploit&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;who approved this architecture?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for my knoledge, but I could be wrong, it isn't possible to have more DSs behind a LB!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you could have more DSs that manage different clients each one but not using a LB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you need more DSs because you have to manage too many clients for only one, you can use more resources (CPUs and RAMs) or more DSs but, as I said, each one has to manage a different list of clients.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my experience, one DS with normal resources (12 CPUs and 12 GB RAM) managed more than 2000 clients.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ciao.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:50:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Multiple-Deployment-Server-VIP-Load-Balancer-and-NO-CLIENTS/m-p/519928#M17884</guid>
      <dc:creator>gcusello</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-16T13:50:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple Deployment Server, VIP Load Balancer and NO CLIENTS</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Multiple-Deployment-Server-VIP-Load-Balancer-and-NO-CLIENTS/m-p/519936#M17885</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Splunk has confirmed themselves that this should work along with multiple posts in this community about the same architecture.&amp;nbsp; I have a plan to roll out an abundance of UFs across our enterprise and was recommended this solution.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:06:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Multiple-Deployment-Server-VIP-Load-Balancer-and-NO-CLIENTS/m-p/519936#M17885</guid>
      <dc:creator>cachexploit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-16T14:06:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple Deployment Server, VIP Load Balancer and NO CLIENTS</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Multiple-Deployment-Server-VIP-Load-Balancer-and-NO-CLIENTS/m-p/519938#M17886</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/225177"&gt;@cachexploit&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;forget it, it's really new for me!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ciao.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:09:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Multiple-Deployment-Server-VIP-Load-Balancer-and-NO-CLIENTS/m-p/519938#M17886</guid>
      <dc:creator>gcusello</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-16T14:09:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple Deployment Server, VIP Load Balancer and NO CLIENTS</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Multiple-Deployment-Server-VIP-Load-Balancer-and-NO-CLIENTS/m-p/519944#M17887</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is new to me also, but after short googling sessio it seems to be working solution.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;How about LB’s sticky session setting. Is it on or off? Probably better if nodes call at lest some time to the same backend instead of changing it on every &amp;nbsp;request to different backend node even in same transaction.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;r. Ismo&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:52:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Multiple-Deployment-Server-VIP-Load-Balancer-and-NO-CLIENTS/m-p/519944#M17887</guid>
      <dc:creator>isoutamo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-16T14:52:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple Deployment Server, VIP Load Balancer and NO CLIENTS</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Multiple-Deployment-Server-VIP-Load-Balancer-and-NO-CLIENTS/m-p/531907#M18295</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So just as an update, we were able to get this to work through an F5 Loadbalancer and VIP.&amp;nbsp; You have to make sure that there are no http profiles assigned to the VIP rule on the F5.&amp;nbsp; Once we were able to do that, we can see that the Handshakes are being completed successfully and we see all the clients checking in throughout the day to all 3 deployment servers.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 18:55:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Multiple-Deployment-Server-VIP-Load-Balancer-and-NO-CLIENTS/m-p/531907#M18295</guid>
      <dc:creator>cachexploit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-03T18:55:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

