<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: What would be a proper order of operations when applying an OS patch on a SH cluster? in Deployment Architecture</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/What-would-be-a-proper-order-of-operations-when-applying-an-OS/m-p/483519#M16793</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok, when applying the patch, we simply shut down the SH and then start it after the patch is being applied?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:52:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>danielbb</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-01-15T17:52:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>What would be a proper order of operations when applying an OS patch on a SH cluster?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/What-would-be-a-proper-order-of-operations-when-applying-an-OS/m-p/483517#M16791</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In the last patch operation on our ITSI cluster of three SHs, we had syncing issues with the SHs. What can be a good sequence of operations when applying an OS patch on the cluster's servers?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:07:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/What-would-be-a-proper-order-of-operations-when-applying-an-OS/m-p/483517#M16791</guid>
      <dc:creator>danielbb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-15T17:07:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What would be a proper order of operations when applying an OS patch on a SH cluster?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/What-would-be-a-proper-order-of-operations-when-applying-an-OS/m-p/483518#M16792</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Patch one server at a time. Starts with the members then do the captain last.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:40:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/What-would-be-a-proper-order-of-operations-when-applying-an-OS/m-p/483518#M16792</guid>
      <dc:creator>masonmorales</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-15T17:40:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What would be a proper order of operations when applying an OS patch on a SH cluster?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/What-would-be-a-proper-order-of-operations-when-applying-an-OS/m-p/483519#M16793</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok, when applying the patch, we simply shut down the SH and then start it after the patch is being applied?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:52:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/What-would-be-a-proper-order-of-operations-when-applying-an-OS/m-p/483519#M16793</guid>
      <dc:creator>danielbb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-15T17:52:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What would be a proper order of operations when applying an OS patch on a SH cluster?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/What-would-be-a-proper-order-of-operations-when-applying-an-OS/m-p/483520#M16794</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Looking at the upgrade procedure and it says at &lt;A href="https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/8.0.1/DistSearch/UpgradeaSHC"&gt;Upgrade a search head cluster&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="alt text"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.splunk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/8208i31F3A877AD1E82CC/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="alt text" alt="alt text" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I would assume the sequence to be quite the same.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;In the Cluster Administration it was said however - &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;-- The captain is the final member to restart (during a rolling-restart) and automatically invokes captaincy transfer, thus preventing captaincy from changing during the restart process.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;That's exactly what @masonmorales just said.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 20:19:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/What-would-be-a-proper-order-of-operations-when-applying-an-OS/m-p/483520#M16794</guid>
      <dc:creator>danielbb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-15T20:19:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What would be a proper order of operations when applying an OS patch on a SH cluster?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/What-would-be-a-proper-order-of-operations-when-applying-an-OS/m-p/483521#M16795</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Should we apply a &lt;CODE&gt;manual detention&lt;/CODE&gt; on each SH during the process?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 20:46:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/What-would-be-a-proper-order-of-operations-when-applying-an-OS/m-p/483521#M16795</guid>
      <dc:creator>danielbb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-15T20:46:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

