<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Splunk on AWS EC2 in Deployment Architecture</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Splunk-on-AWS-EC2/m-p/47246#M1422</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;We're working with Splunk on Amazon's EC2 service (Ubuntu).&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;At the moment we're working off a standard instance, at 10cent per hour.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I was going to upgrade to a high CPU medium instance, at 20cent per hour.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;With AWS' announcement &lt;A href="http://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2010/09/09/announcing-micro-instances-for-amazon-ec2/" rel="nofollow"&gt;today&lt;/A&gt; regarding micro instances, I was wondering.....&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;"Am I better with 1 high CPU medium instance, 2 standard instances, or 10 micro instances?"&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Okay, so there's a strong "string L=N, derive N" element to the question.  But if I had to choose a route, any suggestions? &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:23:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>garfieldconnoll</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-09-10T02:23:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Splunk on AWS EC2</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Splunk-on-AWS-EC2/m-p/47246#M1422</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;We're working with Splunk on Amazon's EC2 service (Ubuntu).&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;At the moment we're working off a standard instance, at 10cent per hour.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I was going to upgrade to a high CPU medium instance, at 20cent per hour.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;With AWS' announcement &lt;A href="http://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2010/09/09/announcing-micro-instances-for-amazon-ec2/" rel="nofollow"&gt;today&lt;/A&gt; regarding micro instances, I was wondering.....&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;"Am I better with 1 high CPU medium instance, 2 standard instances, or 10 micro instances?"&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Okay, so there's a strong "string L=N, derive N" element to the question.  But if I had to choose a route, any suggestions? &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:23:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Splunk-on-AWS-EC2/m-p/47246#M1422</guid>
      <dc:creator>garfieldconnoll</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-10T02:23:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Splunk on AWS EC2</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Splunk-on-AWS-EC2/m-p/47247#M1423</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When in AWS, I would recommend scaling using units of the High-CPU XL instances. It seems like you need less capacity than this, but of the choices, I am pretty sure the 10 micro instances will be unsuitable and clumsy for a typical Splunk workload. I think the Standard Small is also too small, even with two of them, as you are limited to just one core per machine. Between the Standard Large and the High-CPU Large, I might go with the High-CPU, unless you plan to store you indexes on the instance rather than on EBS, in which case the additional space on the Standard might count for more.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 03:55:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Splunk-on-AWS-EC2/m-p/47247#M1423</guid>
      <dc:creator>gkanapathy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-10T03:55:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Splunk on AWS EC2</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Splunk-on-AWS-EC2/m-p/47248#M1424</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for that.  I'd +1 the post, but I don't have permission yet.  We don't have a lot of data, but may have a disproportionate number of users for the amount of indexed data.  Apologies if I have the 'wrong end of the stick' on that.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;G.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 05:19:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Splunk-on-AWS-EC2/m-p/47248#M1424</guid>
      <dc:creator>garfieldconnoll</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-10T05:19:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Splunk on AWS EC2</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Splunk-on-AWS-EC2/m-p/47249#M1425</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Able to thank gkanapathy's response now, so doing so!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 02:36:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Deployment-Architecture/Splunk-on-AWS-EC2/m-p/47249#M1425</guid>
      <dc:creator>garfieldconnoll</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-21T02:36:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

