<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Question about pipeline parallelization in Splunk Enterprise</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Question-about-pipeline-parallelization/m-p/352289#M7189</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey @aab5272, If esix solved your problem, please don't forget to accept an answer! You can upvote posts as well. (Karma points will be awarded for either action.) Happy Splunking!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 23:04:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lfedak_splunk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-09-21T23:04:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Question about pipeline parallelization</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Question-about-pipeline-parallelization/m-p/352285#M7185</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;How can I  achieve pipeline parallelization in standalone Splunk indexer to optimize my CPU usage?&lt;BR /&gt;
In Splunk 2016 .conf, it is mentioned to use above method if CPU is underutilized. For this, server.conf requires below changes:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;parallelIngestionPipelines = 2&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;are there any other configuration changes required?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Also , do we need to  configure in inputs.conf   or in other configuration to bind these to use a specific pipeline processors  or splunk takes care of this by own?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:45:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Question-about-pipeline-parallelization/m-p/352285#M7185</guid>
      <dc:creator>aab5272</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-20T17:45:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about pipeline parallelization</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Question-about-pipeline-parallelization/m-p/352286#M7186</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is the only configuration option required for enabling additional pipelines. Once enabled, restart Splunk and it will work!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:53:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Question-about-pipeline-parallelization/m-p/352286#M7186</guid>
      <dc:creator>esix_splunk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-20T17:53:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about pipeline parallelization</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Question-about-pipeline-parallelization/m-p/352287#M7187</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yup. Just to add: parallelIngestionPipelines are very much dependent on your disk write performance, so make sure you are not constrained on that before you enable it.&lt;BR /&gt;
Indexing is generally not a very CPU-intensive process, so your mileage may vary. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:59:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Question-about-pipeline-parallelization/m-p/352287#M7187</guid>
      <dc:creator>s2_splunk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-20T17:59:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about pipeline parallelization</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Question-about-pipeline-parallelization/m-p/352288#M7188</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;@ssievert sure thank you for your prompt reply. &lt;BR /&gt;
I will try it . &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;My typing queues are getting filled(because of  too many extraction rules)  very often which is causing downstream queues to get filled too . When i checked my CPU, it  is underutilized so I thought if I enable parallelization it will clear the backlogs in pipeline processor.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;What should I Consider about disk write performance before enabling parallelization?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Agan thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 20:46:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Question-about-pipeline-parallelization/m-p/352288#M7188</guid>
      <dc:creator>aab5272</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-20T20:46:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about pipeline parallelization</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Question-about-pipeline-parallelization/m-p/352289#M7189</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey @aab5272, If esix solved your problem, please don't forget to accept an answer! You can upvote posts as well. (Karma points will be awarded for either action.) Happy Splunking!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 23:04:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Question-about-pipeline-parallelization/m-p/352289#M7189</guid>
      <dc:creator>lfedak_splunk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-21T23:04:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about pipeline parallelization</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Question-about-pipeline-parallelization/m-p/352290#M7190</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you don't normally see your indexing queues blocked, you are probably fine. Start with two parallelIngestion pipelines and monitor behavior.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 01:53:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Question-about-pipeline-parallelization/m-p/352290#M7190</guid>
      <dc:creator>s2_splunk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-22T01:53:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

