<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Replication factor = 1 and maintenance mode in Splunk Enterprise</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Replication-factor-1-and-maintenance-mode-does-not-do-much-in/m-p/587458#M11740</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/231884"&gt;@PickleRick&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what do you mean with "RF=1"? in this way you haven't HA!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ciao.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 15:07:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gcusello</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-03-03T15:07:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Replication factor = 1 and maintenance mode does not do much in this situation, correct?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Replication-factor-1-and-maintenance-mode-does-not-do-much-in/m-p/587451#M11739</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;While preparing to upgrade of an indexer cluster with RF=1 I'm wondering what's the effective behaviour of a cluster in maintenance mode with this RF.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If an indexer goes down because of the upgrade activity and restart, there is no data to replicate to other nodes anyway so no fixups should occur.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So maintenance mode does not really do much in this case, am I right?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 17:34:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Replication-factor-1-and-maintenance-mode-does-not-do-much-in/m-p/587451#M11739</guid>
      <dc:creator>PickleRick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-03T17:34:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replication factor = 1 and maintenance mode</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Replication-factor-1-and-maintenance-mode-does-not-do-much-in/m-p/587458#M11740</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/231884"&gt;@PickleRick&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what do you mean with "RF=1"? in this way you haven't HA!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ciao.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 15:07:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Replication-factor-1-and-maintenance-mode-does-not-do-much-in/m-p/587458#M11740</guid>
      <dc:creator>gcusello</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-03T15:07:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replication factor = 1 and maintenance mode</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Replication-factor-1-and-maintenance-mode-does-not-do-much-in/m-p/587464#M11741</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, I'm fully aware of that. That's why I wrote that there's nothing to replicate in case one indexer is down &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 15:24:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Replication-factor-1-and-maintenance-mode-does-not-do-much-in/m-p/587464#M11741</guid>
      <dc:creator>PickleRick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-03T15:24:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replication factor = 1 and maintenance mode</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Replication-factor-1-and-maintenance-mode-does-not-do-much-in/m-p/587469#M11742</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.splunk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/231884"&gt;@PickleRick&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in this case, you also could not use an Indexer Cluster, so you have one server less.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and you don't need maintenence mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ciao.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 15:36:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Replication-factor-1-and-maintenance-mode-does-not-do-much-in/m-p/587469#M11742</guid>
      <dc:creator>gcusello</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-03T15:36:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replication factor = 1 and maintenance mode</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Replication-factor-1-and-maintenance-mode-does-not-do-much-in/m-p/587472#M11743</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Well, I'll be able to use the cluster, it's just that I'll be getting incomplete results from searches because of partial data unavailability. Been there, done that, got the T-shirt &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It could as well be just a simple distributed search setup but I have those indexers clustered so the buckets can be rebalanced manually in need. Don't ask, I "inherited" it that way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But I was simply wondering whether I was properly interpreting the maintenance mode effect. It seems I do - no data to replicate thus no unnecessary bucket fixup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 15:43:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Enterprise/Replication-factor-1-and-maintenance-mode-does-not-do-much-in/m-p/587472#M11743</guid>
      <dc:creator>PickleRick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-03T15:43:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

