<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Splunk Add-on for Apache vs pretrained sourcetypes in All Apps and Add-ons</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Splunk-Add-on-for-Apache-vs-pretrained-sourcetypes/m-p/498531#M61347</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Is the Apache Add-on falling out of favor?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;It hasn't been updated since 1.0.0 release&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;It doesn't officially support 7.3 or 8.0 (though unofficially it works fine)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Splunk can natively parse apache logs using the &lt;EM&gt;access_combined&lt;/EM&gt; and &lt;EM&gt;apache_error&lt;/EM&gt; pretrained sourcetypes&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;If you need more thorough CIM mapping than the pretrained sourcetypes offer, then there's an unofficial 'Add-on for Access Combined' available on splunkbase that does the job with fewer field extractions than the Apache add-on, and without the need for another sourcetype&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 20:10:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>satyenshah</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-11-27T20:10:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Splunk Add-on for Apache vs pretrained sourcetypes</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Splunk-Add-on-for-Apache-vs-pretrained-sourcetypes/m-p/498531#M61347</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is the Apache Add-on falling out of favor?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;It hasn't been updated since 1.0.0 release&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;It doesn't officially support 7.3 or 8.0 (though unofficially it works fine)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Splunk can natively parse apache logs using the &lt;EM&gt;access_combined&lt;/EM&gt; and &lt;EM&gt;apache_error&lt;/EM&gt; pretrained sourcetypes&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;If you need more thorough CIM mapping than the pretrained sourcetypes offer, then there's an unofficial 'Add-on for Access Combined' available on splunkbase that does the job with fewer field extractions than the Apache add-on, and without the need for another sourcetype&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 20:10:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Splunk-Add-on-for-Apache-vs-pretrained-sourcetypes/m-p/498531#M61347</guid>
      <dc:creator>satyenshah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-27T20:10:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

