<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Anyone else see that Bit9 Carbon Black aliases CIM fields incorrectly? in All Apps and Add-ons</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Anyone-else-see-that-Bit9-Carbon-Black-aliases-CIM-fields/m-p/402717#M49159</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We fixed the whole thing ourselves. Switched around some fields, removed some cruft and mapped netconn eventtypes that have a domain to the Network Resolution datamodel.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Next up: process execution mapping to the Change Analysis datamodel (file_name, file_hash, etc.)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 19:43:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>marand</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-09-29T19:43:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Anyone else see that Bit9 Carbon Black aliases CIM fields incorrectly?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Anyone-else-see-that-Bit9-Carbon-Black-aliases-CIM-fields/m-p/402716#M49158</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;We recently enabled some telemetry on our CbR agents. This means we now receive type:netconn events.&lt;BR /&gt;
A netconn event turns out to be a kind of a mix of dns/domain and traffic sourcetype. Everything is tagged for the Traffic DM.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;So we added an alias to map the "domain" field from the netconn event as "query" and tagged the netconn events containing a "domain" value with the correct Network Resolution constraint tags; and voilá, Network Resolution DM gets populated. Threat Activity works.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;But that made me look at the other fields....and....obvious aliases are missing and even plain wrong in some cases&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Some quick examples:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Consider the following "dns" events:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;index="carbonblack" sourcetype="bit9:carbonblack:json" netconn AND NOT domain=""
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;These are with a direction=outbound. Setting aside that they are not tagged for Network Resolution by default (one could argue this is kind of correct), some aliases are missing, such as src_ip and src_port even though they are part of the raw log. Technically we don't need them for neither the DNS DM or the Traffic DM, but there is no reason &lt;EM&gt;not&lt;/EM&gt; to have them.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;That's a minor issue and fixable.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;However, looking at netconn  inbound events is where the the whole thing is a mess:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;index=carbonblack sourcetype=bit9:carbonblack:json event_type=netconn AND direction=inbound
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Here the aliases have not been flipped to account for the direction being inbound.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;STRONG&gt;remote_*&lt;/STRONG&gt; values in the raw log are being aliased to "&lt;STRONG&gt;dest_*&lt;/STRONG&gt;". Since this is an INBOUND event, the mapping should of course be &lt;STRONG&gt;remote_*&lt;/STRONG&gt; -&amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;src_*&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;local_*&lt;/STRONG&gt; -&amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;dest_*&lt;/STRONG&gt;, since the local machine &lt;EM&gt;is the destination&lt;/EM&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Can anyone confirm that this is what they also are seeing?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;We plan on fixing this ourselves, but we feel that this should be fixed by the TA dev's, because there are a lot of changes that need to be done.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;br&lt;BR /&gt;
Marc&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 19:34:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Anyone-else-see-that-Bit9-Carbon-Black-aliases-CIM-fields/m-p/402716#M49158</guid>
      <dc:creator>marand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-29T19:34:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Anyone else see that Bit9 Carbon Black aliases CIM fields incorrectly?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Anyone-else-see-that-Bit9-Carbon-Black-aliases-CIM-fields/m-p/402717#M49159</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We fixed the whole thing ourselves. Switched around some fields, removed some cruft and mapped netconn eventtypes that have a domain to the Network Resolution datamodel.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Next up: process execution mapping to the Change Analysis datamodel (file_name, file_hash, etc.)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 19:43:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Anyone-else-see-that-Bit9-Carbon-Black-aliases-CIM-fields/m-p/402717#M49159</guid>
      <dc:creator>marand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-29T19:43:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

