<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Core Sizing Capacity in All Apps and Add-ons</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Core-Sizing-Capacity/m-p/385755#M46935</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;hi, try again&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 15:24:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>grivera_kudaw</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-05-27T15:24:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Core Sizing Capacity</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Core-Sizing-Capacity/m-p/385748#M46928</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi. Dears&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Somebody can help me?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I need know what is the capacity of my Splunk to execute concurrents searches&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;This is currently  the CPU capacity  my servers&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Server..........Physical_CPU......Vitual_CPU......CorexSocket......Socket......Thread x core......#CPUs&lt;BR /&gt;
SH1.......................2..........................-.......................10.....................2.....................2.....................40&lt;BR /&gt;
SH2 ......................1..........................-.........................8.....................1.....................2.......................6&lt;BR /&gt;
SH3(virtual)..........-...........................2.........................6.....................2.....................1.....................12&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
IDX1......................2.........................-..........................4.....................2.....................2.....................16 &lt;BR /&gt;
IDX2......................2.........................-..........................8.....................2.....................1.....................16&lt;BR /&gt;
IDX3(virtual).........-...........................2.........................8.....................2.....................1.....................16      &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:39:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Core-Sizing-Capacity/m-p/385748#M46928</guid>
      <dc:creator>grivera_kudaw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-30T00:39:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Core Sizing Capacity</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Core-Sizing-Capacity/m-p/385749#M46929</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The default will be base_max_searches(defaults to 6) + max_searches_per_cpu(defaults to 1) i.e. a 32-core host can run 38 concurrent searches out of the box.&lt;BR /&gt;
The scheduler can use up to max_searches_perc (defaults to 60) i.e. up 23 of 38 total searches on a 32-core host, the rest being reserved for adhoc queries.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Admin/Limitsconf" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Admin/Limitsconf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Btw, if you are running the monitoring console in distributed mode, it will show you the number of CPU Cores Splunk recognizes under the instances tab (The virtual number is what Splunk will use)&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Example: CPU Cores (Physical / Virtual)&lt;BR /&gt;
4 / 8&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:42:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Core-Sizing-Capacity/m-p/385749#M46929</guid>
      <dc:creator>bandit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-30T00:42:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Core Sizing Capacity</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Core-Sizing-Capacity/m-p/385750#M46930</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, Rob, thank you for your answer.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Then, to this case:&lt;BR /&gt;
Considering 60% to scheduler searches&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;SH1 = ((6+48)*60)/100   = 32 Max concurrente searches&lt;BR /&gt;
SH2 =((6+16)*60)/100   =  13  Max concurrente searches&lt;BR /&gt;
SH3 = ((6+12)*60)/100   = 11 Max concurrente searches&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The total to the Cluster is :  32+13+11= 56 concurrent searches that my system can &lt;BR /&gt;
approximately execute?  &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:42:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Core-Sizing-Capacity/m-p/385750#M46930</guid>
      <dc:creator>grivera_kudaw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-30T00:42:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Core Sizing Capacity</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Core-Sizing-Capacity/m-p/385751#M46931</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;correction: SH1 = ((6+40)*60)/100 = 27 Max concurrente searches&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 18:27:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Core-Sizing-Capacity/m-p/385751#M46931</guid>
      <dc:creator>grivera_kudaw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-24T18:27:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Core Sizing Capacity</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Core-Sizing-Capacity/m-p/385752#M46932</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When I pressed "submit" I just saw your Monitoring Console paragraph. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:"&gt;😄&lt;/span&gt; Deleted my comment.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Skalli&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 20:58:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Core-Sizing-Capacity/m-p/385752#M46932</guid>
      <dc:creator>skalliger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-24T20:58:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Core Sizing Capacity</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Core-Sizing-Capacity/m-p/385753#M46933</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, that looks valid for maximum searches than can be run by the Splunk scheduler. Note that you can adjust max_searches_per_cpu (although usually not a good idea).  max_searches_perc  could be adjusted up/down 10% etc. depending on whether the system will be running mostly scheduled searches/alerts vs. user adhoc searches.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Total Searches able to execute (scheduled and adhoc) would be:&lt;BR /&gt;
SH1 = ((6+48) = 54 Max concurrente searches&lt;BR /&gt;
SH2 =((6+16)  = 22 Max concurrente searches&lt;BR /&gt;
SH3 = ((6+12) = 18 Max concurrente searches&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:40:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Core-Sizing-Capacity/m-p/385753#M46933</guid>
      <dc:creator>bandit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-30T00:40:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Core Sizing Capacity</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Core-Sizing-Capacity/m-p/385754#M46934</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help, Now I have it more clear&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 15:23:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Core-Sizing-Capacity/m-p/385754#M46934</guid>
      <dc:creator>grivera_kudaw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-27T15:23:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Core Sizing Capacity</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Core-Sizing-Capacity/m-p/385755#M46935</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi, try again&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 15:24:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Core-Sizing-Capacity/m-p/385755#M46935</guid>
      <dc:creator>grivera_kudaw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-27T15:24:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Core Sizing Capacity</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Core-Sizing-Capacity/m-p/385756#M46936</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;An latest question.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;In the implemnattion I see this configuration by SH&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;limits.conf&lt;BR /&gt;
max_historical_searches_per_cpu=4&lt;BR /&gt;
base_max_searches = 6&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;then to this cluster will be:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;max_historical_searches_per_cpu x number_of_cpus + base_max_searches&lt;BR /&gt;
4*(40+16+12)+6 = 278 &lt;BR /&gt;
Or calculate one by one and after sum it?&lt;BR /&gt;
4*40+6 =166&lt;BR /&gt;
4*16+6= 70&lt;BR /&gt;
4*12+6= 54&lt;BR /&gt;
= 290&lt;BR /&gt;
The results are differents&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Well this configuration is wrong, but I dont have problems  because the average of concurrent searches is the only 1.40&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Core-Sizing-Capacity/m-p/385756#M46936</guid>
      <dc:creator>grivera_kudaw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-30T00:41:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Core Sizing Capacity</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Core-Sizing-Capacity/m-p/385757#M46937</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;And , I see an ancient message on the splunkd.log, say:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;05-09-2019 13:46:11.904 -0400 ERROR SHCMaster - Search not executed: The maximum number of historical concurrent system-wide searches has been reached. current=108 maximum=105 for search: admin;xxxxxxxxx&lt;BR /&gt;
But I don´t how obtained this value: 105 ??&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 17:02:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Core-Sizing-Capacity/m-p/385757#M46937</guid>
      <dc:creator>grivera_kudaw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-27T17:02:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

