<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: whats the best practices for partitioning the OS in All Apps and Add-ons</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/whats-the-best-practices-for-partitioning-the-OS/m-p/69810#M4341</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi @allamiro Are these standard value? can you please give me a reference from where you took these values?       &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 12:55:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Inayath_khan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-01-06T12:55:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>whats the best practices for partitioning the OS</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/whats-the-best-practices-for-partitioning-the-OS/m-p/69807#M4338</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does any one know what are the best practices for partitioning the Linux OS i.e redhat / centos for the Splunk application server ?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;lets say I have 250 GB   can some one advise on this ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:20:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/whats-the-best-practices-for-partitioning-the-OS/m-p/69807#M4338</guid>
      <dc:creator>allamiro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-07T15:20:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: whats the best practices for partitioning the OS</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/whats-the-best-practices-for-partitioning-the-OS/m-p/69808#M4339</link>
      <description>&lt;H1&gt;Disk partitioning information&lt;/H1&gt;

&lt;P&gt;part / =60000&lt;BR /&gt;
part /boot =1000&lt;BR /&gt;
part /home =60000&lt;BR /&gt;
part /var --size=15000&lt;BR /&gt;
part /tmp  size=20000&lt;BR /&gt;
part /usr =20000&lt;BR /&gt;
part /opt =50000&lt;BR /&gt;
part /isos  =7000&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Would that be ok ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:34:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/whats-the-best-practices-for-partitioning-the-OS/m-p/69808#M4339</guid>
      <dc:creator>allamiro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-07T15:34:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: whats the best practices for partitioning the OS</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/whats-the-best-practices-for-partitioning-the-OS/m-p/69809#M4340</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is a highly subjective question.  Much of how you answer it depends on scale of installation.  However there are some good, general principles.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Use Logical Volume Manager&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Follow a standard "server" layout with different filesystems for &lt;CODE&gt;/&lt;/CODE&gt;, &lt;CODE&gt;/boot&lt;/CODE&gt;, &lt;CODE&gt;/usr&lt;/CODE&gt;, &lt;CODE&gt;/var&lt;/CODE&gt;, &lt;CODE&gt;/tmp&lt;/CODE&gt;, and &lt;CODE&gt;/opt&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Put Splunk into its own filesystem on &lt;CODE&gt;/opt/splunk&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Put Splunk's index buckets into their own filesystem - at a minimum, &lt;CODE&gt;/opt/splunk/var/lib/splunk&lt;/CODE&gt; should to be in its own filesystem&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;

&lt;P&gt;It's also important to consider the number of drives (spindles) you have, and what types they are.  For optimum performance, Splunk needs RAID-10 and 800+ IOPS for hot buckets.  This could mean an 8 drive (4+4P) RAID-10 array.  Obviously, your base OS does not need this level of performance but it could piggyback off of it.  Cold buckets can live on RAID-5 on separate spindles and still give adequate performance (if you have the drive slots to do it) - which would necessitate a different filesystem for hot/warm vs cold.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;HR /&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;NOTE:&lt;/STRONG&gt;  The above advice about a RAID-5 volume just for cold buckets is somewhat out of date with the introduction of Splunk 5.0 and indexer clustering.  The &lt;A href="http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/5.0.2/Indexer/Systemrequirements"&gt;documentation&lt;/A&gt; says:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On a non-clustered indexer, by&lt;BR /&gt;
specifying separate partitions for&lt;BR /&gt;
hot/warm buckets and cold buckets, you&lt;BR /&gt;
can designate different types of&lt;BR /&gt;
storage for each. This is useful&lt;BR /&gt;
because cold buckets are typically&lt;BR /&gt;
accessed less frequently than hot/warm&lt;BR /&gt;
buckets and therefore can be located&lt;BR /&gt;
on slower disk arrays. Also, Splunk&lt;BR /&gt;
doesn't usually need to perform index&lt;BR /&gt;
processing on cold buckets. See "Use&lt;BR /&gt;
multiple partitions for index data"&lt;BR /&gt;
for details on this.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;On a cluster, however, this approach&lt;BR /&gt;
is not recommended. The storage used&lt;BR /&gt;
for the coldPath location should have&lt;BR /&gt;
the same performance characteristics&lt;BR /&gt;
as that used for homePath storage.&lt;BR /&gt;
This is because all replicated copies&lt;BR /&gt;
of buckets reside in the peers'&lt;BR /&gt;
coldPath directories. It doesn't&lt;BR /&gt;
matter whether they're hot, warm, or&lt;BR /&gt;
cold. If you use slower storage for&lt;BR /&gt;
the coldPath location, it will slow&lt;BR /&gt;
the overall performance of your&lt;BR /&gt;
cluster.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Clusters require strongly performing&lt;BR /&gt;
storage for the coldPath location in&lt;BR /&gt;
order to handle the needs of cluster&lt;BR /&gt;
operations. For example, some of the&lt;BR /&gt;
buckets in the coldPath location will&lt;BR /&gt;
be replicated hot bucket copies still&lt;BR /&gt;
being written to. Other buckets will&lt;BR /&gt;
be replicated warm copies, and the&lt;BR /&gt;
search head might be accessing them&lt;BR /&gt;
frequently. In addition, depending on&lt;BR /&gt;
how the cluster is configured and what&lt;BR /&gt;
occurs subsequently (in terms of peers&lt;BR /&gt;
going offline, etc.), the peer might&lt;BR /&gt;
need to convert bucket copies from&lt;BR /&gt;
non-searchable to searchable,&lt;BR /&gt;
entailing a considerable amount of&lt;BR /&gt;
processing on the coldPath data.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 17:18:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/whats-the-best-practices-for-partitioning-the-OS/m-p/69809#M4340</guid>
      <dc:creator>dwaddle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-07T17:18:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: whats the best practices for partitioning the OS</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/whats-the-best-practices-for-partitioning-the-OS/m-p/69810#M4341</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi @allamiro Are these standard value? can you please give me a reference from where you took these values?       &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 12:55:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/whats-the-best-practices-for-partitioning-the-OS/m-p/69810#M4341</guid>
      <dc:creator>Inayath_khan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-06T12:55:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

