<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Splunk Technology Add On for Unix and Linux opensource repository in All Apps and Add-ons</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Splunk-Technology-Add-On-for-Unix-and-Linux-opensource/m-p/56054#M3286</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have seen a number of announcements for previous versions of the Unix and Linux TA to be on GitHub, but it is not there. For example (&lt;A href="http://blogs.splunk.com/2011/11/07/splunk-for-unix-and-linux-an-update-and-an-introduction/):"&gt;http://blogs.splunk.com/2011/11/07/splunk-for-unix-and-linux-an-update-and-an-introduction/):&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Finally, it is worth mentioning that both these apps are open sourced under the Apache license and will soon be available on Splunk’s github.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Are there still plans to have the a public repository for the TA, and is it still under an Apache licence?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I am asking as I would like to make some improvements, and there should be a place new features, issues/bugs can be tracked. I would prefer not working on issues that are already being attended to, or will be made irrelevant by changes.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 01:05:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>alanfinlay</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-09-06T01:05:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Splunk Technology Add On for Unix and Linux opensource repository</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Splunk-Technology-Add-On-for-Unix-and-Linux-opensource/m-p/56054#M3286</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have seen a number of announcements for previous versions of the Unix and Linux TA to be on GitHub, but it is not there. For example (&lt;A href="http://blogs.splunk.com/2011/11/07/splunk-for-unix-and-linux-an-update-and-an-introduction/):"&gt;http://blogs.splunk.com/2011/11/07/splunk-for-unix-and-linux-an-update-and-an-introduction/):&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Finally, it is worth mentioning that both these apps are open sourced under the Apache license and will soon be available on Splunk’s github.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Are there still plans to have the a public repository for the TA, and is it still under an Apache licence?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I am asking as I would like to make some improvements, and there should be a place new features, issues/bugs can be tracked. I would prefer not working on issues that are already being attended to, or will be made irrelevant by changes.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 01:05:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Splunk-Technology-Add-On-for-Unix-and-Linux-opensource/m-p/56054#M3286</guid>
      <dc:creator>alanfinlay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-06T01:05:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Splunk Technology Add On for Unix and Linux opensource repository</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Splunk-Technology-Add-On-for-Unix-and-Linux-opensource/m-p/56055#M3287</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No, the initiative to open source the *nix app and put it up on github never actualized.  The app is still being released under the Splunk Software License Agreement.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 15:42:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/All-Apps-and-Add-ons/Splunk-Technology-Add-On-for-Unix-and-Linux-opensource/m-p/56055#M3287</guid>
      <dc:creator>araitz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-09T15:42:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

