<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic [NodeJS] Ignoring unnecessary agent dependencies in Splunk AppDynamics</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-AppDynamics/NodeJS-Ignoring-unnecessary-agent-dependencies/m-p/723989#M4000</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I'm currently using the&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;proxyless&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;(libagent: true) version of the NodeJS. I'd like to know if any of the 6 dependencies the "appdynamics" module uses could be ignored:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;appdynamics-jre&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;appdynamics-libagent&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;appdynamics-native&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;appdynamics-protobuf&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;appdynamics-proxy&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;appdynamics-zmq&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'd guess the&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;jre&lt;/STRONG&gt; and&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;proxy&lt;/STRONG&gt; are unnecessary. What about the others? How can I be sure of this?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Gabriel Saldanha (@gcrsaldanha)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:48:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CommunityUser</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-02-20T19:48:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>[NodeJS] Ignoring unnecessary agent dependencies</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-AppDynamics/NodeJS-Ignoring-unnecessary-agent-dependencies/m-p/723989#M4000</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I'm currently using the&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;proxyless&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;(libagent: true) version of the NodeJS. I'd like to know if any of the 6 dependencies the "appdynamics" module uses could be ignored:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;appdynamics-jre&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;appdynamics-libagent&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;appdynamics-native&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;appdynamics-protobuf&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;appdynamics-proxy&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;appdynamics-zmq&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'd guess the&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;jre&lt;/STRONG&gt; and&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;proxy&lt;/STRONG&gt; are unnecessary. What about the others? How can I be sure of this?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Gabriel Saldanha (@gcrsaldanha)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:48:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-AppDynamics/NodeJS-Ignoring-unnecessary-agent-dependencies/m-p/723989#M4000</guid>
      <dc:creator>CommunityUser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-20T19:48:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [NodeJS] Ignoring unnecessary agent dependencies</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-AppDynamics/NodeJS-Ignoring-unnecessary-agent-dependencies/m-p/723990#M4001</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Gabriel,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;It's safest to leave them in place for now. We have long terms plans to eliminate the old code at some point, but currently there may be unintended impact to removing them. However, if you're feeling bold and need to space savings, probably you can remove the jre subdependency.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Kyle&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:57:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-AppDynamics/NodeJS-Ignoring-unnecessary-agent-dependencies/m-p/723990#M4001</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kyle_Furlong</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-20T19:57:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

