<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Exclude transaction in Splunk AppDynamics</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-AppDynamics/Exclude-business-transaction/m-p/719982#M1791</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Maxime,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What agent version are you running?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am afraid you may be hitting a regression with respect to the handling of exclude rules which was introduced in 4.5.16 and will be resolved in 4.5.19&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If so, please accept my apologies for the inconvenience.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Warm regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Peter&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 13:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Peter_Holditch</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-10T13:55:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Exclude business transaction</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-AppDynamics/Exclude-business-transaction/m-p/719981#M1790</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello community,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I encountered a problem with BT exclusion.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I configured a rule (scope is good) to exclude a BT from automatically being discovered: URI contains 'socket'.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The config is present in the transaction.xml file of my agent:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;servlet-entry-points enabled="true"&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;custom/&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;automatic-transaction-discovery enabled="true" resolution="first-entry-point"&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;excludes&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;exclude name="SocketExclude"&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;servlet-rule&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;enabled&amp;gt;true&amp;lt;/enabled&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;priority&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/priority&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;excluded&amp;gt;false&amp;lt;/excluded&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;uri filter-type="CONTAINS" filter-value="/socket"/&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;/servlet-rule&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;/exclude&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;but the agent is still registrering BT :&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;[AD Thread Pool-Global19] 10 Feb 2020 16:42:16,542 INFO BusinessTransactionRegistry - Registered BT Name[/myapp/socket/750/oa4riml3/xhr_streaming], Id[540]&lt;BR /&gt;[AD Thread Pool-Global19] 10 Feb 2020 16:42:16,542 INFO BusinessTransactionRegistry - Registered BT Name[/emyapp/socket/info], Id[541]&lt;BR /&gt;[AD Thread Pool-Global19] 10 Feb 2020 16:42:16,542 INFO BusinessTransactionRegistry - Registered BT Name[/myapp/socket/750/gxqnx3vy/websocket], Id[542]&lt;/P&gt;


&lt;P&gt;And I find them in the controller. Am I doing something wrong?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Besides I cannot exclude manually in the BT screen because par 3 and 4 of the URI are dynamic.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:56:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-AppDynamics/Exclude-business-transaction/m-p/719981#M1790</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maxime_Renaux</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-10T12:56:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Exclude transaction</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-AppDynamics/Exclude-business-transaction/m-p/719982#M1791</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Maxime,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What agent version are you running?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am afraid you may be hitting a regression with respect to the handling of exclude rules which was introduced in 4.5.16 and will be resolved in 4.5.19&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If so, please accept my apologies for the inconvenience.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Warm regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Peter&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 13:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-AppDynamics/Exclude-business-transaction/m-p/719982#M1791</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter_Holditch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-10T13:55:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Exclude transaction</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-AppDynamics/Exclude-business-transaction/m-p/719983#M1792</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have the same problem. I've configured a rule to exclude transactions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I created 'Custom Match Rule', and ticked 'Exclude Transactions discovered by this rule'. However, the matching business transactions keep being discovered.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The controller looks like 4.5.4. Is there any problem in this version also?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="AppDVer.PNG" style="width: 388px;"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="image.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.splunk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/36380iF1F8EA69386661A0/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="image.png" alt="image.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2020 05:56:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-AppDynamics/Exclude-business-transaction/m-p/719983#M1792</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Lee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-19T05:56:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Exclude transaction</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-AppDynamics/Exclude-business-transaction/m-p/719984#M1793</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Same situation here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Spring Boot generates an &lt;EM&gt;/actuator/health&lt;/EM&gt; transaction, which I believe that it's intended for liveness purposes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In any case, it's generating a lot of useless transaction traffic that we want to exclude.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I simply add an &lt;EM&gt;Exclude Transactions discovered by this rule&lt;/EM&gt;, with the following match criteria:&lt;BR /&gt;"URI" "Ends With" "/actuator/health"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But it doesn't work because the transaction is still discovered as if the exclude rule won't exist.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And if I change the rule to be a &lt;EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Include Transactions discovered by this rule&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;, it discovers new business transactions, so apparently its not a problem of the match criteria, but the transaction exclude.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our Controller version is &lt;SPAN&gt;20.6.0-2184&lt;/SPAN&gt;, and agent version &lt;SPAN&gt;v4.5.14 GA&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 07:57:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-AppDynamics/Exclude-business-transaction/m-p/719984#M1793</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mikel_Osinalde_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-20T07:57:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Exclude transaction</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-AppDynamics/Exclude-business-transaction/m-p/719985#M1794</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have learnt about the node property &lt;EM&gt;check-bt-excludes-early&lt;/EM&gt;, which saved my day!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This property "r&lt;SPAN class="conf-macro output-inline"&gt;everses the default order in which Java and .NET agents evaluate rules. If true, exclude rules are evaluated before match rules."&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="conf-macro output-inline"&gt;More information here:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.appdynamics.com/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=49447586" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer"&gt;https://docs.appdynamics.com/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=49447586&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 10:32:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-AppDynamics/Exclude-business-transaction/m-p/719985#M1794</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mikel_Osinalde_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-04T10:32:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

