<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Official Port for Splunk from IETF in Security</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/Official-Port-for-Splunk-from-IETF/m-p/14791#M364</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Splunk does not require a specific port, rather it is leveraging existing protocols and their designations. This will be dependent upon many factors specific to each individual implementation. Below are a few examples:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;HTTP&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;HTTPS:&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Syslog&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;SNMP&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;WMI&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;.....&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Addition details about each protocol and associate port with descriptions are availble via &lt;A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IP_protocol_numbers" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 09:14:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Toups</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-12-03T09:14:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Official Port for Splunk from IETF</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/Official-Port-for-Splunk-from-IETF/m-p/14790#M363</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is Splunk looking to get an official port declared by the IETF? Inquiring students want to know. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 11:40:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/Official-Port-for-Splunk-from-IETF/m-p/14790#M363</guid>
      <dc:creator>DrewO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-03T11:40:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Official Port for Splunk from IETF</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/Official-Port-for-Splunk-from-IETF/m-p/14791#M364</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Splunk does not require a specific port, rather it is leveraging existing protocols and their designations. This will be dependent upon many factors specific to each individual implementation. Below are a few examples:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;HTTP&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;HTTPS:&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Syslog&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;SNMP&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;WMI&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;.....&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Addition details about each protocol and associate port with descriptions are availble via &lt;A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IP_protocol_numbers" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 09:14:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/Official-Port-for-Splunk-from-IETF/m-p/14791#M364</guid>
      <dc:creator>Toups</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-03T09:14:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Official Port for Splunk from IETF</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/Official-Port-for-Splunk-from-IETF/m-p/14792#M365</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;He meant, are 8000 and 8089 going to make it into everyone's /etc/services someday.  Since you're a fan of Wikipedia, check out &lt;A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 08:45:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/Official-Port-for-Splunk-from-IETF/m-p/14792#M365</guid>
      <dc:creator>V_at_Splunk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-06T08:45:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

