<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Truecrypt and splunk in Security</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/Truecrypt-and-splunk/m-p/66964#M2198</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am not 100% sure that a service will be able to mount a truecrypt volume without an interactive logon. It may be possible, but in either case you will still see a performance penalty since every read/write operation will have to be de/encrypted before splunk has access to the data. Since splunk is quite disk intensive during indexing/searching, this overhead may lead to a very sluggish system performance.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I'd say just try it out on a dev system and report back with your findings for the good of the community &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 23:34:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ftk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-10-08T23:34:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Truecrypt and splunk</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/Truecrypt-and-splunk/m-p/66962#M2196</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, 
has anyone ever put splunkdb in a truecrypt encrypted volume succesfully?
Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Luca.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:07:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/Truecrypt-and-splunk/m-p/66962#M2196</guid>
      <dc:creator>cafissimo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-08T16:07:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Truecrypt and splunk</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/Truecrypt-and-splunk/m-p/66963#M2197</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have not, but if you are able to successfully run the following command on the volume, all should be well:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;./splunk cmd locktest
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.splunk.com/base/Documentation/4.1.5/Installation/Systemrequirements#Supported_file_systems" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.splunk.com/base/Documentation/4.1.5/Installation/Systemrequirements#Supported_file_systems&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 22:16:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/Truecrypt-and-splunk/m-p/66963#M2197</guid>
      <dc:creator>araitz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-08T22:16:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Truecrypt and splunk</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/Truecrypt-and-splunk/m-p/66964#M2198</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am not 100% sure that a service will be able to mount a truecrypt volume without an interactive logon. It may be possible, but in either case you will still see a performance penalty since every read/write operation will have to be de/encrypted before splunk has access to the data. Since splunk is quite disk intensive during indexing/searching, this overhead may lead to a very sluggish system performance.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I'd say just try it out on a dev system and report back with your findings for the good of the community &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 23:34:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/Truecrypt-and-splunk/m-p/66964#M2198</guid>
      <dc:creator>ftk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-08T23:34:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

