<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic What can be a light sanity check for content? in Security</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/What-can-be-a-light-sanity-check-for-content/m-p/311902#M13527</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Our users would like to run queries, on a regular basis, which would show them that their data keeps flowing in without issues. One user came up with the following - &lt;CODE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
index=xxxxxx  earliest=-1m | stats latest(_time) as latestTime by host sourcetype source | eval latestTime=strftime(latestTime,"%x,%X")&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Is it reasonable?  I think that tstats is better, right?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:26:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ddrillic</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-02-20T19:26:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>What can be a light sanity check for content?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/What-can-be-a-light-sanity-check-for-content/m-p/311902#M13527</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Our users would like to run queries, on a regular basis, which would show them that their data keeps flowing in without issues. One user came up with the following - &lt;CODE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
index=xxxxxx  earliest=-1m | stats latest(_time) as latestTime by host sourcetype source | eval latestTime=strftime(latestTime,"%x,%X")&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Is it reasonable?  I think that tstats is better, right?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:26:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/What-can-be-a-light-sanity-check-for-content/m-p/311902#M13527</guid>
      <dc:creator>ddrillic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-20T19:26:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What can be a light sanity check for content?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/What-can-be-a-light-sanity-check-for-content/m-p/311903#M13528</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Tstats much better as it's faster. Since multiple users are going to run this, you need something faster.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;| tstats latest(_time) as latestTime WHERE index=xxxxxx earliest=-1m by host sourcetype source | eval latestTime=strftime(latestTime,"%x,%X")
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:34:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/What-can-be-a-light-sanity-check-for-content/m-p/311903#M13528</guid>
      <dc:creator>somesoni2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-20T19:34:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What can be a light sanity check for content?</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/What-can-be-a-light-sanity-check-for-content/m-p/311904#M13529</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Perfect!!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:36:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/What-can-be-a-light-sanity-check-for-content/m-p/311904#M13529</guid>
      <dc:creator>ddrillic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-20T19:36:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

