<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SH Cluster Prevent Config Replication in Security</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/SH-Cluster-Prevent-Config-Replication/m-p/560088#M12434</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Question -&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I wanted to prevent SAML/SSO configurations from replicating to other SHs in a cluster, could I use the 'conf_replication_blacklist.&amp;lt;name&amp;gt;' or something similar to exclude the authentication.conf? Or would that cause more issues outside of just preventing SAML/SSO configs to be unsyncd?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Context -&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;We are migrating from onprem servers to AWS servers. The current configurations for SSO/SAML only work for the onprem servers, and we will need new configs for the AWS servers. The configs are in the etc/system/local/authentication.conf, so already at highest precendence.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, while working on those configurations we don't want to break the working SSO for onprem. We don't want to make it a separate cluster, cause then we'd have to get all the searches/lookups replicated across some other way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I came across the 'conf_replication_summary.blacklist' and 'conf_replication_include.&amp;lt;conf_file_name&amp;gt; = &amp;lt;boolean&amp;gt;' in the server.conf spec, and was wondering if anyone has any experience using these for&amp;nbsp;authentication.conf and if there are complications I should be aware of? Cause if we could use these to temporarily pause the replication with no real ill effects, that'd be great.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:30:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sivrat</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-19T16:30:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SH Cluster Prevent Config Replication</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/SH-Cluster-Prevent-Config-Replication/m-p/560088#M12434</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Question -&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I wanted to prevent SAML/SSO configurations from replicating to other SHs in a cluster, could I use the 'conf_replication_blacklist.&amp;lt;name&amp;gt;' or something similar to exclude the authentication.conf? Or would that cause more issues outside of just preventing SAML/SSO configs to be unsyncd?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Context -&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;We are migrating from onprem servers to AWS servers. The current configurations for SSO/SAML only work for the onprem servers, and we will need new configs for the AWS servers. The configs are in the etc/system/local/authentication.conf, so already at highest precendence.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, while working on those configurations we don't want to break the working SSO for onprem. We don't want to make it a separate cluster, cause then we'd have to get all the searches/lookups replicated across some other way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I came across the 'conf_replication_summary.blacklist' and 'conf_replication_include.&amp;lt;conf_file_name&amp;gt; = &amp;lt;boolean&amp;gt;' in the server.conf spec, and was wondering if anyone has any experience using these for&amp;nbsp;authentication.conf and if there are complications I should be aware of? Cause if we could use these to temporarily pause the replication with no real ill effects, that'd be great.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:30:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Security/SH-Cluster-Prevent-Config-Replication/m-p/560088#M12434</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sivrat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-19T16:30:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

