<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>rss.livelink.thread@place:occasion</title>
    <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Community-Office-Hours/Getting-Data-In-Forwarders-Wed-5-22-24/ec-p/688922#M101</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Here are a few questions from the session (get the full Q&amp;amp;A deck and live recording in the&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;A href="https://splunk-usergroups.slack.com/archives/C0FRVF350" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;#office-hours&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;Slack channel):&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q1:&amp;nbsp;Seeing bottlenecks in forwarder getting data to Splunk Cloud, should output be pointed to multiple ports?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;There could be multiple reasons for a bottleneck but multiple ports is not the answer.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I would first be checking outputs.conf to make sure the throughput is set accordingly. MaxKBps defaults to 256 but this can be increased in increments or set to unlimited.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Assuming the bottleneck is throughput, splitting the data across multiple Heavy Forwarders may help.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Troubleshooting guide can be found &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/SplunkCloud/9.1.2312/Forwarding/Receiverconnection" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Here&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Further reading can be found &lt;A href="https://conf.splunk.com/files/2019/slides/FN1570.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Here&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q2:&amp;nbsp;Any light weight forwarders for IoT use cases? or Edge Processor is the one?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Depending on the IoT configuration and use case, we would recommend either sending data to a Syslog receiver in Edge Processor, or traditional Syslog-ng, or if you are wanting to collect directly from sensors, controllers, etc. and sending to Splunk you can use the Splunk Edge Hub, a physical appliance purpose-built for these use cases.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Splunk Edge Hub Central &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://edgehubcentral.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;link&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Edge Processor Syslog configuration &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/SplunkCloud/9.1.2312/EdgeProcessor/SyslogSource" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;documentation&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q3:&amp;nbsp;What are the strategies for Windows Services monitoring and hang scenarios&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We typically recommend the Splunk Add-on for Microsoft Windows as it ingests data according to CIM and will integrate well with advanced use cases and existing applications on Splunk Platform.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For Splunk Observability, you can use a set of different receivers on the OpenTelemetry Collector such as the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/tree/main/receiver/windowsperfcountersreceiver" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;windowsperfcounters&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; receiver, the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/tree/main/receiver/windowseventlogreceiver" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;windowseventlog&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; receiver. Additionally you can look at the contrib receivers such as &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/tree/main/receiver/iisreceiver" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;iisreceiver&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; or the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/tree/main/receiver/activedirectorydsreceiver" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;activedirectoryds&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; receiver.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Windows add-on &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/742" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;here&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Windows &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.2.1/Data/AboutWindowsdataandSplunk" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;best practices doc&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;OpenTelemetry receivers docs &lt;A href="https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/tree/main/receiver/windowseventlogreceiver" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt; and &lt;A href="https://docs.splunk.com/observability/en/gdi/opentelemetry/components/windowsperfcounters-receiver.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Other Questions (check the&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;A href="https://splunk-usergroups.slack.com/archives/C0FRVF350" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;#office-hours&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;Slack channel for responses):&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Are universal forwarders the way forward, and when should HF be used instead? For old OS like Win 7 anyone tried newer versions?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;How to filter events from logs&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Would like to know more about input filtering at Universal Forwarder&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;REST APIs dashboard against IISLogs (already fwd) would like to identify obsolete endpoints (ep) and daily usage per endpoint&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;From a PCI v4.0 perspective, what are the required security and operational logs that have to be ingested and analyzed in Splunk&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Demo on upgrading forwarders from deployment servers&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Cisco SNA/Stealthwatch integration&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Input phase transformations at forwarder&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Practical applications for SIEM &amp;amp; SOAR technologies&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;I am experiencing an issue while using rsyslog for logging.&amp;nbsp; When I read the data on the port using tcpdump I can see that the data coming in is clean.&amp;nbsp; When I read the data that is written from that port to the flat file the file has a bunch of brackets [ ] inserted through the data that was not there.&amp;nbsp; This causes the Cyberark Add-On to not extracts some of the fields correctly and as a result some of the field has the bracket inserted in some of the field values which causes the logs to not be normalized or extracted property for usage in monitoring.&amp;nbsp; I found an article that states that this is a known issue but need to build a test Syslog host to test the solution.&amp;nbsp; Need guidance on how to build that so I can test the solution.&amp;nbsp; UF is installed on server where syslog is writing data.&amp;nbsp; Any thoughts?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 22:59:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>adepp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-05-28T22:59:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Getting Data In: Forwarders - Wed 5/22/24</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Community-Office-Hours/Getting-Data-In-Forwarders-Wed-5-22-24/ec-p/681896#M91</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://splunk.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_OtXFHlpgTH2zlmQNwF3PhQ" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Register here.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;This thread is for the Community Office Hours session on&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;Getting Data In (GDI): Forwarders&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;on&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;Wed, May 22, 2024 at 1pm PT / 4pm ET.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This is your opportunity to ask questions related to getting data into Splunk Platform using forwarders. Including:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Universal Forwarder (UF) or heavy forwarder (HF) deployment/configuration&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Troubleshooting forwarder connectivity issues, blocked queues, etc.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Improving forwarder performance&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Anything else you’d like to learn!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Please submit your questions at registration or as comments below.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;You can also head to&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://splunk-usergroups.slack.com/archives/C0FRVF350" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;#office-hours&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;user Slack channel to ask questions (request access&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://splk.it/slack" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;here&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Pre-submitted questions will be prioritized&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;. After that, we will open the floor up to live Q&amp;amp;A with meeting participants.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Look forward to connecting!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 23:15:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Community-Office-Hours/Getting-Data-In-Forwarders-Wed-5-22-24/ec-p/681896#M91</guid>
      <dc:creator>adepp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-28T23:15:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Getting Data In: Forwarders - Wed 5/22/24</title>
      <link>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Community-Office-Hours/Getting-Data-In-Forwarders-Wed-5-22-24/ec-p/688922#M101</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Here are a few questions from the session (get the full Q&amp;amp;A deck and live recording in the&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;A href="https://splunk-usergroups.slack.com/archives/C0FRVF350" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;#office-hours&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;Slack channel):&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q1:&amp;nbsp;Seeing bottlenecks in forwarder getting data to Splunk Cloud, should output be pointed to multiple ports?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;There could be multiple reasons for a bottleneck but multiple ports is not the answer.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I would first be checking outputs.conf to make sure the throughput is set accordingly. MaxKBps defaults to 256 but this can be increased in increments or set to unlimited.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Assuming the bottleneck is throughput, splitting the data across multiple Heavy Forwarders may help.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Troubleshooting guide can be found &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/SplunkCloud/9.1.2312/Forwarding/Receiverconnection" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Here&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Further reading can be found &lt;A href="https://conf.splunk.com/files/2019/slides/FN1570.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Here&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q2:&amp;nbsp;Any light weight forwarders for IoT use cases? or Edge Processor is the one?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Depending on the IoT configuration and use case, we would recommend either sending data to a Syslog receiver in Edge Processor, or traditional Syslog-ng, or if you are wanting to collect directly from sensors, controllers, etc. and sending to Splunk you can use the Splunk Edge Hub, a physical appliance purpose-built for these use cases.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Splunk Edge Hub Central &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://edgehubcentral.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;link&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Edge Processor Syslog configuration &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/SplunkCloud/9.1.2312/EdgeProcessor/SyslogSource" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;documentation&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q3:&amp;nbsp;What are the strategies for Windows Services monitoring and hang scenarios&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We typically recommend the Splunk Add-on for Microsoft Windows as it ingests data according to CIM and will integrate well with advanced use cases and existing applications on Splunk Platform.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For Splunk Observability, you can use a set of different receivers on the OpenTelemetry Collector such as the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/tree/main/receiver/windowsperfcountersreceiver" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;windowsperfcounters&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; receiver, the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/tree/main/receiver/windowseventlogreceiver" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;windowseventlog&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; receiver. Additionally you can look at the contrib receivers such as &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/tree/main/receiver/iisreceiver" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;iisreceiver&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; or the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/tree/main/receiver/activedirectorydsreceiver" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;activedirectoryds&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; receiver.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Windows add-on &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/742" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;here&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Windows &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.2.1/Data/AboutWindowsdataandSplunk" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;best practices doc&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;OpenTelemetry receivers docs &lt;A href="https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/tree/main/receiver/windowseventlogreceiver" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt; and &lt;A href="https://docs.splunk.com/observability/en/gdi/opentelemetry/components/windowsperfcounters-receiver.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Other Questions (check the&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;A href="https://splunk-usergroups.slack.com/archives/C0FRVF350" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;#office-hours&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;Slack channel for responses):&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Are universal forwarders the way forward, and when should HF be used instead? For old OS like Win 7 anyone tried newer versions?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;How to filter events from logs&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Would like to know more about input filtering at Universal Forwarder&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;REST APIs dashboard against IISLogs (already fwd) would like to identify obsolete endpoints (ep) and daily usage per endpoint&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;From a PCI v4.0 perspective, what are the required security and operational logs that have to be ingested and analyzed in Splunk&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Demo on upgrading forwarders from deployment servers&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Cisco SNA/Stealthwatch integration&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Input phase transformations at forwarder&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Practical applications for SIEM &amp;amp; SOAR technologies&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;I am experiencing an issue while using rsyslog for logging.&amp;nbsp; When I read the data on the port using tcpdump I can see that the data coming in is clean.&amp;nbsp; When I read the data that is written from that port to the flat file the file has a bunch of brackets [ ] inserted through the data that was not there.&amp;nbsp; This causes the Cyberark Add-On to not extracts some of the fields correctly and as a result some of the field has the bracket inserted in some of the field values which causes the logs to not be normalized or extracted property for usage in monitoring.&amp;nbsp; I found an article that states that this is a known issue but need to build a test Syslog host to test the solution.&amp;nbsp; Need guidance on how to build that so I can test the solution.&amp;nbsp; UF is installed on server where syslog is writing data.&amp;nbsp; Any thoughts?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 22:59:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.splunk.com/t5/Community-Office-Hours/Getting-Data-In-Forwarders-Wed-5-22-24/ec-p/688922#M101</guid>
      <dc:creator>adepp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-28T22:59:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

